The Stacks project

42.21 Rational equivalence and the projective line

Let $(S, \delta )$ be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let $X$ be a scheme locally of finite type over $S$. Given any closed subscheme $Z \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S = X \times \mathbf{P}^1$ we let $Z_0$, resp. $Z_\infty $ be the scheme theoretic closed subscheme $Z_0 = \text{pr}_2^{-1}(D_0)$, resp. $Z_\infty = \text{pr}_2^{-1}(D_\infty )$. Here $D_0$, $D_\infty $ are as in (42.18.1.1).

Lemma 42.21.1. Let $(S, \delta )$ be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let $X$ be a scheme locally of finite type over $S$. Let $W \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S$ be an integral closed subscheme of $\delta $-dimension $k + 1$. Assume $W \not= W_0$, and $W \not= W_\infty $. Then

  1. $W_0$, $W_\infty $ are effective Cartier divisors of $W$,

  2. $W_0$, $W_\infty $ can be viewed as closed subschemes of $X$ and

    \[ [W_0]_ k \sim _{rat} [W_\infty ]_ k, \]
  3. for any locally finite family of integral closed subschemes $W_ i \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S$ of $\delta $-dimension $k + 1$ with $W_ i \not= (W_ i)_0$ and $W_ i \not= (W_ i)_\infty $ we have $\sum ([(W_ i)_0]_ k - [(W_ i)_\infty ]_ k) \sim _{rat} 0$ on $X$, and

  4. for any $\alpha \in Z_ k(X)$ with $\alpha \sim _{rat} 0$ there exists a locally finite family of integral closed subschemes $W_ i \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S$ as above such that $\alpha = \sum ([(W_ i)_0]_ k - [(W_ i)_\infty ]_ k)$.

Proof. Part (1) follows from Divisors, Lemma 31.13.13 since the generic point of $W$ is not mapped into $D_0$ or $D_\infty $ under the projection $X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S \to \mathbf{P}^1_ S$ by assumption.

Since $X \times _ S D_0 \to X$ is a closed immersion, we see that $W_0$ is isomorphic to a closed subscheme of $X$. Similarly for $W_\infty $. The morphism $p : W \to X$ is proper as a composition of the closed immersion $W \to X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S$ and the proper morphism $X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S \to X$. By Lemma 42.18.2 we have $[W_0]_ k \sim _{rat} [W_\infty ]_ k$ as cycles on $W$. Hence part (2) follows from Lemma 42.20.3 as clearly $p_*[W_0]_ k = [W_0]_ k$ and similarly for $W_\infty $.

The only content of statement (3) is, given parts (1) and (2), that the collection $\{ (W_ i)_0, (W_ i)_\infty \} $ is a locally finite collection of closed subschemes of $X$. This is clear.

Suppose that $\alpha \sim _{rat} 0$. By definition this means there exist integral closed subschemes $V_ i \subset X$ of $\delta $-dimension $k + 1$ and rational functions $f_ i \in R(V_ i)^*$ such that the family $\{ V_ i\} _{i \in I}$ is locally finite in $X$ and such that $\alpha = \sum (V_ i \to X)_*\text{div}(f_ i)$. Let

\[ W_ i \subset V_ i \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S \]

be the closure of the graph of the rational map $f_ i$ as in Lemma 42.18.2. Then we have that $(V_ i \to X)_*\text{div}(f_ i)$ is equal to $[(W_ i)_0]_ k - [(W_ i)_\infty ]_ k$ by that same lemma. Hence the result is clear. $\square$

Lemma 42.21.2. Let $(S, \delta )$ be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let $X$ be a scheme locally of finite type over $S$. Let $Z$ be a closed subscheme of $X \times \mathbf{P}^1$. Assume

  1. $\dim _\delta (Z) \leq k + 1$,

  2. $\dim _\delta (Z_0) \leq k$, $\dim _\delta (Z_\infty ) \leq k$, and

  3. for any embedded point $\xi $ (Divisors, Definition 31.4.1) of $Z$ either $\xi \not\in Z_0 \cup Z_\infty $ or $\delta (\xi ) < k$.

Then $[Z_0]_ k \sim _{rat} [Z_\infty ]_ k$ as $k$-cycles on $X$.

Proof. Let $\{ W_ i\} _{i \in I}$ be the collection of irreducible components of $Z$ which have $\delta $-dimension $k + 1$. Write

\[ [Z]_{k + 1} = \sum n_ i[W_ i] \]

with $n_ i > 0$ as per definition. Note that $\{ W_ i\} $ is a locally finite collection of closed subsets of $X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S$ by Divisors, Lemma 31.26.1. We claim that

\[ [Z_0]_ k = \sum n_ i[(W_ i)_0]_ k \]

and similarly for $[Z_\infty ]_ k$. If we prove this then the lemma follows from Lemma 42.21.1.

Let $Z' \subset X$ be an integral closed subscheme of $\delta $-dimension $k$. To prove the equality above it suffices to show that the coefficient $n$ of $[Z']$ in $[Z_0]_ k$ is the same as the coefficient $m$ of $[Z']$ in $\sum n_ i[(W_ i)_0]_ k$. Let $\xi ' \in Z'$ be the generic point. Set $\xi = (\xi ', 0) \in X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S$. Consider the local ring $A = \mathcal{O}_{X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S, \xi }$. Let $I \subset A$ be the ideal cutting out $Z$, in other words so that $A/I = \mathcal{O}_{Z, \xi }$. Let $t \in A$ be the element cutting out $X \times _ S D_0$ (i.e., the coordinate of $\mathbf{P}^1$ at zero pulled back). By our choice of $\xi ' \in Z'$ we have $\delta (\xi ) = k$ and hence $\dim (A/I) = 1$. Since $\xi $ is not an embedded point by assumption (3) we see that $A/I$ is Cohen-Macaulay. Since $\dim _\delta (Z_0) = k$ we see that $\dim (A/(t, I)) = 0$ which implies that $t$ is a nonzerodivisor on $A/I$. Finally, the irreducible closed subschemes $W_ i$ passing through $\xi $ correspond to the minimal primes $I \subset \mathfrak q_ i$ over $I$. The multiplicities $n_ i$ correspond to the lengths $\text{length}_{A_{\mathfrak q_ i}}(A/I)_{\mathfrak q_ i}$. Hence we see that

\[ n = \text{length}_ A(A/(t, I)) \]

and

\[ m = \sum \text{length}_ A(A/(t, \mathfrak q_ i)) \text{length}_{A_{\mathfrak q_ i}}(A/I)_{\mathfrak q_ i} \]

Thus the result follows from Lemma 42.3.2. $\square$

Lemma 42.21.3. Let $(S, \delta )$ be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let $X$ be a scheme locally of finite type over $S$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent sheaf on $X \times \mathbf{P}^1$. Let $i_0, i_\infty : X \to X \times \mathbf{P}^1$ be the closed immersion such that $i_ t(x) = (x, t)$. Denote $\mathcal{F}_0 = i_0^*\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{F}_\infty = i_\infty ^*\mathcal{F}$. Assume

  1. $\dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})) \leq k + 1$,

  2. $\dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_0)) \leq k$, $\dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_\infty )) \leq k$, and

  3. for any embedded associated point $\xi $ of $\mathcal{F}$ either $\xi \not\in (X \times \mathbf{P}^1)_0 \cup (X \times \mathbf{P}^1)_\infty $ or $\delta (\xi ) < k$.

Then $[\mathcal{F}_0]_ k \sim _{rat} [\mathcal{F}_\infty ]_ k$ as $k$-cycles on $X$.

Proof. Let $\{ W_ i\} _{i \in I}$ be the collection of irreducible components of $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})$ which have $\delta $-dimension $k + 1$. Write

\[ [\mathcal{F}]_{k + 1} = \sum n_ i[W_ i] \]

with $n_ i > 0$ as per definition. Note that $\{ W_ i\} $ is a locally finite collection of closed subsets of $X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S$ by Lemma 42.10.1. We claim that

\[ [\mathcal{F}_0]_ k = \sum n_ i[(W_ i)_0]_ k \]

and similarly for $[\mathcal{F}_\infty ]_ k$. If we prove this then the lemma follows from Lemma 42.21.1.

Let $Z' \subset X$ be an integral closed subscheme of $\delta $-dimension $k$. To prove the equality above it suffices to show that the coefficient $n$ of $[Z']$ in $[\mathcal{F}_0]_ k$ is the same as the coefficient $m$ of $[Z']$ in $\sum n_ i[(W_ i)_0]_ k$. Let $\xi ' \in Z'$ be the generic point. Set $\xi = (\xi ', 0) \in X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S$. Consider the local ring $A = \mathcal{O}_{X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S, \xi }$. Let $M = \mathcal{F}_\xi $ as an $A$-module. Let $t \in A$ be the element cutting out $X \times _ S D_0$ (i.e., the coordinate of $\mathbf{P}^1$ at zero pulled back). By our choice of $\xi ' \in Z'$ we have $\delta (\xi ) = k$ and hence $\dim (\text{Supp}(M)) = 1$. Since $\xi $ is not an associated point of $\mathcal{F}$ by assumption (3) we see that $M$ is a Cohen-Macaulay module. Since $\dim _\delta (\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_0)) = k$ we see that $\dim (\text{Supp}(M/tM)) = 0$ which implies that $t$ is a nonzerodivisor on $M$. Finally, the irreducible closed subschemes $W_ i$ passing through $\xi $ correspond to the minimal primes $\mathfrak q_ i$ of $\text{Ass}(M)$. The multiplicities $n_ i$ correspond to the lengths $\text{length}_{A_{\mathfrak q_ i}}M_{\mathfrak q_ i}$. Hence we see that

\[ n = \text{length}_ A(M/tM) \]

and

\[ m = \sum \text{length}_ A(A/(t, \mathfrak q_ i)A) \text{length}_{A_{\mathfrak q_ i}}M_{\mathfrak q_ i} \]

Thus the result follows from Lemma 42.3.2. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 02S3. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.