The Stacks project

Geometric irreductibility is Zariski local modulo connectedness.

Lemma 33.8.5. Let $k$ be a field. Let $X$ be a scheme over $k$. The following are equivalent

  1. $X$ is geometrically irreducible over $k$,

  2. for every nonempty affine open $U$ the $k$-algebra $\mathcal{O}_ X(U)$ is geometrically irreducible over $k$ (see Algebra, Definition 10.47.4),

  3. $X$ is irreducible and there exists an affine open covering $X = \bigcup U_ i$ such that each $k$-algebra $\mathcal{O}_ X(U_ i)$ is geometrically irreducible, and

  4. there exists an open covering $X = \bigcup _{i \in I} X_ i$ with $I \not= \emptyset $ such that $X_ i$ is geometrically irreducible for each $i$ and such that $X_ i \cap X_ j \not= \emptyset $ for all $i, j \in I$.

Moreover, if $X$ is geometrically irreducible so is every nonempty open subscheme of $X$.

Proof. An affine scheme $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ over $k$ is geometrically irreducible if and only if $A$ is geometrically irreducible over $k$; this is immediate from the definitions. Recall that if a scheme is irreducible so is every nonempty open subscheme of $X$, any two nonempty open subsets have a nonempty intersection. Also, if every affine open is irreducible then the scheme is irreducible, see Properties, Lemma 28.3.3. Hence the final statement of the lemma is clear, as well as the implications (1) $\Rightarrow $ (2), (2) $\Rightarrow $ (3), and (3) $\Rightarrow $ (4). If (4) holds, then for any field extension $k'/k$ the scheme $X_{k'}$ has a covering by irreducible opens which pairwise intersect. Hence $X_{k'}$ is irreducible. Hence (4) implies (1). $\square$


Comments (3)

Comment #775 by Keenan Kidwell on

We should assume is non-empty in (2) and (4) so that e.g. the covering in (4) isn't empty (maybe it's not really necessary in (2) because the empty scheme is affine but not irreducible?). Also, in the last assertion, "open subscheme" should be "non-empty open subscheme."

Comment #793 by on

Yes! Thanks very much (I am catching up to your comments now).

Comment #1115 by Simon Pepin Lehalleur on

Suggested slogan: Geometric irreductibility is Zariski local modulo connectedness.

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 33.8: Geometrically irreducible schemes

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 038G. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.