Lemma 90.13.1. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a predeformation category. Assume $\mathcal{F}$ has a versal formal object. Then $\mathcal{F}$ satisfies (S1).
Proof. Let $\xi $ be a versal formal object of $\mathcal{F}$. Let
\[ \xymatrix{ & x_2 \ar[d] \\ x_1 \ar[r] & x } \]
be a diagram in $\mathcal{F}$ such that $x_2 \to x$ lies over a surjective ring map. Since the natural morphism $\widehat{\mathcal{F}}|_{\mathcal{C}_\Lambda } \xrightarrow {\sim } \mathcal{F}$ is an equivalence (see Remark 90.7.7), we can consider this diagram also as a diagram in $\widehat{\mathcal{F}}$. By Lemma 90.8.11 there exists a morphism $\xi \to x_1$, so by Remark 90.8.10 we also get a morphism $\xi \to x_2$ making the diagram
\[ \xymatrix{ \xi \ar[r] \ar[d] & x_2 \ar[d] \\ x_1 \ar[r] & x } \]
commute. If $x_1 \to x$ and $x_2 \to x$ lie above ring maps $A_1 \to A$ and $A_2 \to A$ then taking the pushforward of $\xi $ to $A_1 \times _ A A_2$ gives an object $y$ as required by (S1). $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)