## Tag `08XX`

## 45.4. Projective covers

In this section we briefly discuss projective covers.

Definition 45.4.1. Let $R$ be a ring. A surjection $P \to M$ of $R$-modules is said to be a

projective cover, or sometimes aprojective envelope, if $P$ is a projective $R$-module and $P \to M$ is an essential surjection.Projective covers do not always exist. For example, if $k$ is a field and $R = k[x]$ is the polynomial ring over $k$, then the module $M = R/(x)$ does not have a projective cover. Namely, for any surjection $f : P \to M$ with $P$ projective over $R$, the proper submodule $(x - 1)P$ surjects onto $M$. Hence $f$ is not essential.

Lemma 45.4.2. Let $R$ be a ring and let $M$ be an $R$-module. If a projective cover of $M$ exists, then it is unique up to isomorphism.

Proof.Let $P \to M$ and $P' \to M$ be projective covers. Because $P$ is a projective $R$-module and $P' \to M$ is surjective, we can find an $R$-module map $\alpha : P \to P'$ compatible with the maps to $M$. Since $P' \to M$ is essential, we see that $\alpha$ is surjective. As $P'$ is a projective $R$-module we can choose a direct sum decomposition $P = \mathop{\rm Ker}(\alpha) \oplus P'$. Since $P' \to M$ is surjective and since $P \to M$ is essential we conclude that $\mathop{\rm Ker}(\alpha)$ is zero as desired. $\square$Here is an example where projective covers exist.

Lemma 45.4.3. Let $(R, \mathfrak m, \kappa)$ be a local ring. Any finite $R$-module has a projective cover.

Proof.Let $M$ be a finite $R$-module. Let $r = \dim_\kappa(M/\mathfrak m M)$. Choose $x_1, \ldots, x_r \in M$ mapping to a basis of $M/\mathfrak m M$. Consider the map $f : R^{\oplus r} \to M$. By Nakayama's lemma this is a surjection (Algebra, Lemma 10.19.1). If $N \subset R^{\oplus r}$ is a proper submodule, then $N/\mathfrak m N \to \kappa^{\oplus r}$ is not surjective (by Nakayama's lemma again) hence $N/\mathfrak m N \to M/\mathfrak m M$ is not surjective. Thus $f$ is an essential surjection. $\square$

The code snippet corresponding to this tag is a part of the file `dualizing.tex` and is located in lines 382–445 (see updates for more information).

```
\section{Projective covers}
\label{section-projective-cover}
\noindent
In this section we briefly discuss projective covers.
\begin{definition}
\label{definition-projective-cover}
Let $R$ be a ring. A surjection $P \to M$ of $R$-modules is said
to be a {\it projective cover}, or sometimes a {\it projective envelope},
if $P$ is a projective $R$-module and $P \to M$ is an essential
surjection.
\end{definition}
\noindent
Projective covers do not always exist. For example, if $k$ is a field
and $R = k[x]$ is the polynomial ring over $k$, then the module $M = R/(x)$
does not have a projective cover. Namely, for any surjection $f : P \to M$
with $P$ projective over $R$, the proper submodule $(x - 1)P$ surjects
onto $M$. Hence $f$ is not essential.
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-projective-cover-unique}
Let $R$ be a ring and let $M$ be an $R$-module. If a projective cover
of $M$ exists, then it is unique up to isomorphism.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Let $P \to M$ and $P' \to M$ be projective covers. Because $P$ is a
projective $R$-module and $P' \to M$ is surjective, we can find an
$R$-module map $\alpha : P \to P'$ compatible with the maps to $M$.
Since $P' \to M$ is essential, we see that $\alpha$ is surjective.
As $P'$ is a projective $R$-module we can choose a direct sum decomposition
$P = \Ker(\alpha) \oplus P'$. Since $P' \to M$ is surjective
and since $P \to M$ is essential we conclude that $\Ker(\alpha)$
is zero as desired.
\end{proof}
\noindent
Here is an example where projective covers exist.
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-projective-covers-local}
Let $(R, \mathfrak m, \kappa)$ be a local ring. Any finite $R$-module has
a projective cover.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Let $M$ be a finite $R$-module. Let $r = \dim_\kappa(M/\mathfrak m M)$.
Choose $x_1, \ldots, x_r \in M$ mapping to a basis of $M/\mathfrak m M$.
Consider the map $f : R^{\oplus r} \to M$. By Nakayama's lemma this is
a surjection (Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-NAK}). If
$N \subset R^{\oplus r}$ is a proper submodule, then
$N/\mathfrak m N \to \kappa^{\oplus r}$ is not surjective (by
Nakayama's lemma again) hence $N/\mathfrak m N \to M/\mathfrak m M$
is not surjective. Thus $f$ is an essential surjection.
\end{proof}
```

## Comments (2)

## Add a comment on tag `08XX`

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the lower-right corner).

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.