Lemma 20.32.7. Let $X$ be a ringed space. Let $K$ be an object of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ and denote $K_{ab}$ its image in $D(\underline{\mathbf{Z}}_ X)$.
For any open $U \subset X$ there is a canonical map $R\Gamma (U, K) \to R\Gamma (U, K_{ab})$ which is an isomorphism in $D(\textit{Ab})$.
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of ringed spaces. There is a canonical map $Rf_*K \to Rf_*(K_{ab})$ which is an isomorphism in $D(\underline{\mathbf{Z}}_ Y)$.
Proof. The map is constructed as follows. Choose a K-injective complex $\mathcal{I}^\bullet $ representing $K$. Choose a quasi-isomorpism $\mathcal{I}^\bullet \to \mathcal{J}^\bullet $ where $\mathcal{J}^\bullet $ is a K-injective complex of abelian groups. Then the map in (1) is given by $\Gamma (U, \mathcal{I}^\bullet ) \to \Gamma (U, \mathcal{J}^\bullet )$ and the map in (2) is given by $f_*\mathcal{I}^\bullet \to f_*\mathcal{J}^\bullet $. To show that these maps are isomorphisms, it suffices to prove they induce isomorphisms on cohomology groups and cohomology sheaves. By Lemmas 20.32.2 and 20.32.6 it suffices to show that the map
is an isomorphism. Observe that
and similarly for the other group. Choose any complex $\mathcal{K}^\bullet $ of $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules representing $K$. By construction of the derived category as a localization we have
where the colimit is over quasi-isomorphisms $s$ of complexes of $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules. Similarly, we have
Next, we observe that the quasi-isomorphisms $s : \mathcal{G}^\bullet \to \underline{\mathbf{Z}}_ X$ with $\mathcal{G}^\bullet $ bounded above complex of flat $\underline{\mathbf{Z}}_ X$-modules is cofinal in the system. (This follows from Modules, Lemma 17.17.6 and Derived Categories, Lemma 13.15.4; see discussion in Section 20.26.) Hence we can construct an inverse to the map $H^0(X, K) \longrightarrow H^0(X, K_{ab})$ by representing an element $\xi \in H^0(X, K_{ab})$ by a pair
with $\mathcal{G}^\bullet $ a bounded above complex of flat $\underline{\mathbf{Z}}_ X$-modules and sending this to
The only thing to note here is that the first arrow is a quasi-isomorphism by Lemmas 20.26.13 and 20.26.9. We omit the detailed verification that this construction is indeed an inverse. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)