The Stacks Project


Tag: 00WM

This tag has label sites-definition-sheaves-injective-surjective and it points to

The corresponding content:

Definition 7.11.1. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site, and let $\varphi : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$ be a map of sheaves of sets.
  1. We say that $\varphi$ is injective if for every object $U$ of $\mathcal{C}$ the map $\varphi : \mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{G}(U)$ is injective.
  2. We say that $\varphi$ is surjective if for every object $U$ of $\mathcal{C}$ and every section $s\in \mathcal{F}(U)$ there exists a covering $\{U_i \to U\}$ such that for all $i$ the restriction $s|_{U_i}$ is in the image of $\varphi : \mathcal{F}(U_i) \to \mathcal{G}(U_i)$.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-sheaves-injective-surjective}
Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a site, and let $\varphi : \mathcal{F}
\to \mathcal{G}$ be a map of sheaves of sets.
\begin{enumerate}
\item We say that $\varphi$ is {\it injective} if for every object
$U$ of $\mathcal{C}$ the map $\varphi : \mathcal{F}(U)
\to \mathcal{G}(U)$ is injective.
\item We say that $\varphi$ is {\it surjective} if for every object
$U$ of $\mathcal{C}$ and every section $s\in \mathcal{F}(U)$
there exists a covering $\{U_i \to U\}$ such that for
all $i$ the restriction $s|_{U_i}$ is in the image of
$\varphi : \mathcal{F}(U_i) \to \mathcal{G}(U_i)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}
    

To cite this tag (see How to reference tags), use:

\cite[\href{http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00WM}{Tag 00WM}]{stacks-project}

Comments (0)

There are no comments yet for this tag.

Add a comment on tag 00WM

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the lower-right corner).




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following box. So in case this is tag 0321 you just have to write 0321. This captcha seems more appropriate than the usual illegible gibberish, right?