The Stacks Project


Tag: 00XR

This tag has label sites-lemma-when-shriek and it points to

The corresponding content:

Lemma 7.19.5. Let $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$ be sites. Let $u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}$ be a functor. Assume that
  1. $u$ is cocontinuous, and
  2. $u$ is continuous.
Let $g : \mathop{\textit{Sh}}\nolimits(\mathcal{C}) \to \mathop{\textit{Sh}}\nolimits(\mathcal{D})$ be the associated morphism of topoi. Then
  1. sheafification in the formula $g^{-1} = (u^p )^\#$ is unnecessary, in other words $g^{-1}(\mathcal{G})(U) = \mathcal{G}(u(U))$,
  2. $g^{-1}$ has a left adjoint $g_{!} = (u_p )^\#$, and
  3. $g^{-1}$ commutes with arbitrary limits and colimits.

Proof. By Lemma 7.13.2 for any sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ on $\mathcal{D}$ the presheaf $u^p\mathcal{G}$ is a sheaf on $\mathcal{C}$. And then we see the adjointness by the following string of equalities \begin{eqnarray*} \mathop{\rm Mor}\nolimits_{\mathop{\textit{Sh}}\nolimits(\mathcal{C})}(\mathcal{F}, g^{-1}\mathcal{G}) & = & \mathop{\rm Mor}\nolimits_{\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{C})}(\mathcal{F}, u^p\mathcal{G}) \\ & = & \mathop{\rm Mor}\nolimits_{\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{D})}(u_p\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G}) \\ & = & \mathop{\rm Mor}\nolimits_{\mathop{\textit{Sh}}\nolimits(\mathcal{D})}(g_{!}\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G}) \end{eqnarray*} The statement on limits and colimits follows from the discussion in Categories, Section 4.23. $\square$

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-when-shriek}
Let $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$ be sites.
Let $u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}$ be a functor.
Assume that
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(a)] $u$ is cocontinuous, and
\item[(b)] $u$ is continuous.
\end{enumerate}
Let $g : \Sh(\mathcal{C}) \to \Sh(\mathcal{D})$
be the associated morphism of topoi. Then
\begin{enumerate}
\item sheafification in the formula $g^{-1} = (u^p\ )^\#$ is
unnecessary, in other words $g^{-1}(\mathcal{G})(U) = \mathcal{G}(u(U))$,
\item $g^{-1}$ has a left adjoint $g_{!} = (u_p\ )^\#$, and
\item $g^{-1}$ commutes with arbitrary limits and colimits.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
By Lemma \ref{lemma-pushforward-sheaf} for any sheaf $\mathcal{G}$
on $\mathcal{D}$ the presheaf $u^p\mathcal{G}$ is a sheaf on $\mathcal{C}$.
And then we see the adjointness by the following string of
equalities
\begin{eqnarray*}
\Mor_{\Sh(\mathcal{C})}(\mathcal{F}, g^{-1}\mathcal{G})
& = &
\Mor_{\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{C})}(\mathcal{F}, u^p\mathcal{G})
\\
& = &
\Mor_{\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{D})}(u_p\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G})
\\
& = &
\Mor_{\Sh(\mathcal{D})}(g_{!}\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G})
\end{eqnarray*}
The statement on limits and colimits follows from the
discussion in Categories, Section \ref{categories-section-adjoint}.
\end{proof}
    

To cite this tag (see How to reference tags), use:

\cite[\href{http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00XR}{Tag 00XR}]{stacks-project}

Comments (0)

There are no comments yet for this tag.

Add a comment on tag 00XR

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the lower-right corner).




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following box. So in case this is tag 0321 you just have to write 0321. This captcha seems more appropriate than the usual illegible gibberish, right?