The Stacks Project


Tag: 06WI

This tag has label stacks-sheaves-lemma-characterize-quasi-coherent and it points to

The corresponding content:

Lemma 65.11.3. Let $p : \mathcal{X} \to (\textit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$ be a category fibred in groupoids. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_\mathcal{X}$-modules. Then $\mathcal{F}$ is quasi-coherent if and only if $x^*\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent sheaf on $(\textit{Sch}/U)_{fppf}$ for every object $x$ of $\mathcal{X}$ with $U = p(x)$.

Proof. By Lemma 65.11.2 the condition is necessary. Conversely, since $x^*\mathcal{F}$ is just the restriction to $\mathcal{X}_{fppf}/x$ we see that it is sufficient directly from the definition of a quasi-coherent sheaf (and the fact that the notion of being quasi-coherent is an intrinsic property of sheaves of modules, see Modules on Sites, Section 17.18). $\square$

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-characterize-quasi-coherent}
Let $p : \mathcal{X} \to (\Sch/S)_{fppf}$ be a category
fibred in groupoids. Let $\mathcal{F}$
be a sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_\mathcal{X}$-modules. Then $\mathcal{F}$
is quasi-coherent if and only if $x^*\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent
sheaf on $(\Sch/U)_{fppf}$ for every object $x$ of
$\mathcal{X}$ with $U = p(x)$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
By
Lemma \ref{lemma-pullback-quasi-coherent}
the condition is necessary. Conversely, since $x^*\mathcal{F}$
is just the restriction to $\mathcal{X}_{fppf}/x$ we see that it
is sufficient directly from the definition of a quasi-coherent sheaf
(and the fact that the notion of being quasi-coherent is an intrinsic
property of sheaves of modules, see
Modules on Sites, Section \ref{sites-modules-section-intrinsic}).
\end{proof}
    

To cite this tag (see How to reference tags), use:

\cite[\href{http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/06WI}{Tag 06WI}]{stacks-project}

Comments (0)

There are no comments yet for this tag.

Add a comment on tag 06WI

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the lower-right corner).




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following box. So in case this is tag 0321 you just have to write 0321. This captcha seems more appropriate than the usual illegible gibberish, right?