## Recent comments

There are currently 2895 comments. You are now displaying comments 20 to 40 in reverse chronological order.

- On November 4 Tanya Kaushal Srivastava left comment 2987 on tag
`0CYF`Small typo in the proof second para: Let $\tilde{\xi}_n$ be the restriction of $\tilde{n}$ to $Sp...

- On November 3 Peng Du left comment 2986 on tag
`01S5`Just a typo: In Lemma 28.11.5. the last result "Moreover, this equivalence if compatible with arbitr...

- On November 3 Tanya Kaushal Srivastava left comment 2985 on tag
`0CXM`Typo in the statement of the lemma: Let Z be the algebraic space representing $\mathcal{W}$ ---> Let...

- On November 1 Tanya Kaushal Srivastava left comment 2984 on tag
`07X9`Small typo in the statement of lemma: then it is and equivalence ---> then it is an equivalence.

- On November 1 Xia left comment 2983 on tag
`02TK`In line 7 of the proof of the first lemma, the latter L should be N

- On October 31 Dario Weißmann left comment 2982 on tag
`00ND`The lemma only holds for finite type polynomial algebras.

- On October 30 Xia left comment 2981 on tag
`0AYB`There seems to be some typos in the first displayed formula in the proof of Lemma 41.26.1 and the br...

- On October 30 Kestutis Cesnavicius left comment 2980 on tag
`0DYD`Thanks for the change. In the statement of (1), one should have $(A/I, J/I)$ instead of $(J/I, A/I)$...

- On October 30 Kestutis Cesnavicius left comment 2979 on tag
`00MA`The statement of this lemma could be improved: completions are taken with respect to what? Similar r...

- On October 29 Dario Weißmann left comment 2978 on tag
`00MT`The inequalities $e\leq i \leq 1$ should go the other way.

- On October 28 Dario Weißmann left comment 2977 on tag
`0D1U`Maybe it should be mentioned in the lemma that we assume $M_{e'}\subset M_{e}$ for $e`\leq e$?

- On October 28 Dario Weißmann left comment 2976 on tag
`00NO`Maybe we could clarify the statement: $d$ is the dimension of $R$.

- On October 27 Fred Rohrer left comment 2975 on tag
`059N`Additional statement: (3) If $M_2$ is Mittag-Leffler and $M_1$ is finitely generated, then $M_3$ is ...

- On October 27 Fred Rohrer left comment 2974 on tag
`059N`Additional statement: (3) If $M_2$ is Mittag-Leffler and $M_1$ is finitely generated, then $M_3$ is ...

- On October 27 Fred Rohrer left comment 2973 on tag
`059N`Additional statement: (3) If $M_2$ is Mittag-Leffler and $M_1$ is finitely generated, then $M_3$ is ...

- On October 26 Michael Neururer left comment 2972 on tag
`0BQD`Before (52.2.9.7.1), shouldn't eta be the generic point of X, rather than "the geometric point".

- On October 26 Daniel Loughran left comment 2971 on tag
`0CLY`Which "valuative criterion" is being refereed to in (2)? The most relevant one I could find is in ta...

- On October 26 Fred Rohrer left comment 2970 on tag
`0595`(1) Replace \it{Mittag-Leffler inverse system} by \it{Mittag-Leffler}. (2) (cf. Comment 2969) "the ...

- On October 26 Fred Rohrer left comment 2969 on tag
`0594`(1) The second part of the first sentence should be changed to something like "... and to explain wh...

- On October 23 Dario Weißmann left comment 2968 on tag
`00SE`Aren't all these conditions equivalent to $C$ is a regular local ring? If we added this condition we...