The Stacks project

Lemma 10.155.2. Let $(R, \mathfrak m, \kappa )$ be a local ring. Let $\kappa \subset \kappa ^{sep}$ be a separable algebraic closure. There exists a commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ \kappa \ar[r] & \kappa \ar[r] & \kappa ^{sep} \\ R \ar[r] \ar[u] & R^ h \ar[r] \ar[u] & R^{sh} \ar[u] } \]

with the following properties

  1. the map $R^ h \to R^{sh}$ is local

  2. $R^{sh}$ is strictly henselian,

  3. $R^{sh}$ is a filtered colimit of étale $R$-algebras,

  4. $\mathfrak m R^{sh}$ is the maximal ideal of $R^{sh}$, and

  5. $\kappa ^{sep} = R^{sh}/\mathfrak m R^{sh}$.

Proof. This is proved by exactly the same proof as used for Lemma 10.155.1. The only difference is that, instead of pairs, one uses triples $(S, \mathfrak q, \alpha )$ where $R \to S$ étale, $\mathfrak q$ is a prime of $S$ lying over $\mathfrak m$, and $\alpha : \kappa (\mathfrak q) \to \kappa ^{sep}$ is an embedding of extensions of $\kappa $. $\square$

Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 8 comment(s) on Section 10.155: Henselization and strict henselization

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 04GP. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.



View Lemma 10.155.2 as pdf