Lemma 47.18.1. Let $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa )$ be a Noetherian local ring. Let $\omega _ A^\bullet $ be a normalized dualizing complex. Let $Z = V(\mathfrak m) \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$. Then $E = R^0\Gamma _ Z(\omega _ A^\bullet )$ is an injective hull of $\kappa $ and $R\Gamma _ Z(\omega _ A^\bullet ) = E[0]$.
47.18 The local duality theorem
The main result in this section is due to Grothendieck.
Proof. By Lemma 47.10.1 we have $R\Gamma _{\mathfrak m} = R\Gamma _ Z$. Thus
\[ R\Gamma _ Z(\omega _ A^\bullet ) = R\Gamma _{\mathfrak m}(\omega _ A^\bullet ) = \text{hocolim}\ R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(A/\mathfrak m^ n, \omega _ A^\bullet ) \]
by Lemma 47.8.2. Let $E'$ be an injective hull of the residue field. By Lemma 47.16.4 we can find isomorphisms
\[ R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(A/\mathfrak m^ n, \omega _ A^\bullet ) \cong \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(A/\mathfrak m^ n, E')[0] \]
compatible with transition maps. Since $E' = \bigcup E'[\mathfrak m^ n] = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(A/\mathfrak m^ n, E')$ by Lemma 47.7.3 we conclude that $E \cong E'$ and that all other cohomology groups of the complex $R\Gamma _ Z(\omega _ A^\bullet )$ are zero. $\square$
Remark 47.18.2. Let $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa )$ be a Noetherian local ring with a normalized dualizing complex $\omega _ A^\bullet $. By Lemma 47.18.1 above we see that $R\Gamma _ Z(\omega _ A^\bullet )$ is an injective hull of the residue field placed in degree $0$. In fact, this gives a “construction” or “realization” of the injective hull which is slightly more canonical than just picking any old injective hull. Namely, a normalized dualizing complex is unique up to isomorphism, with group of automorphisms the group of units of $A$, whereas an injective hull of $\kappa $ is unique up to isomorphism, with group of automorphisms the group of units of the completion $A^\wedge $ of $A$ with respect to $\mathfrak m$.
Here is the main result of this section.
Theorem 47.18.3. Let $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa )$ be a Noetherian local ring. Let $\omega _ A^\bullet $ be a normalized dualizing complex. Let $E$ be an injective hull of the residue field. Let $Z = V(\mathfrak m) \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$. Denote ${}^\wedge $ derived completion with respect to $\mathfrak m$. Then for $K$ in $D(A)$.
\[ R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(K, \omega _ A^\bullet )^\wedge \cong R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(R\Gamma _ Z(K), E[0]) \]
Proof. Observe that $E[0] \cong R\Gamma _ Z(\omega _ A^\bullet )$ by Lemma 47.18.1. By More on Algebra, Lemma 15.91.13 completion on the left hand side goes inside. Thus we have to prove
\[ R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(K^\wedge , (\omega _ A^\bullet )^\wedge ) = R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(R\Gamma _ Z(K), R\Gamma _ Z(\omega _ A^\bullet )) \]
This follows from the equivalence between $D_{comp}(A, \mathfrak m)$ and $D_{\mathfrak m^\infty \text{-torsion}}(A)$ given in Proposition 47.12.2. More precisely, it is a special case of Lemma 47.12.3. $\square$
Here is a special case of the theorem above.
Lemma 47.18.4. Let $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa )$ be a Noetherian local ring. Let $\omega _ A^\bullet $ be a normalized dualizing complex. Let $E$ be an injective hull of the residue field. Let $K \in D_{\textit{Coh}}(A)$. Then where ${}^\wedge $ denotes $\mathfrak m$-adic completion.
\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^{-i}_ A(K, \omega _ A^\bullet )^\wedge = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(H^ i_{\mathfrak m}(K), E) \]
Proof. By Lemma 47.15.3 we see that $R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(K, \omega _ A^\bullet )$ is an object of $D_{\textit{Coh}}(A)$. It follows that the cohomology modules of the derived completion of $R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(K, \omega _ A^\bullet )$ are equal to the usual completions $\mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^ i_ A(K, \omega _ A^\bullet )^\wedge $ by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.94.4. On the other hand, we have $R\Gamma _{\mathfrak m} = R\Gamma _ Z$ for $Z = V(\mathfrak m)$ by Lemma 47.10.1. Moreover, the functor $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(-, E)$ is exact hence factors through cohomology. Hence the lemma is consequence of Theorem 47.18.3. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)