Stacks project -- Comments

#3840 on tag 00YK by Rene

Rene — Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:51:51 GMT

Maybe it should be clarified if 'family of points' means 'set of points'

#3839 on tag 0DVA by slogan_bot

slogan_bot — Sat, 15 Dec 2018 04:32:06 GMT

Suggested slogan: "Any injective on topological spaces map of schemes is separated."

#3838 on tag 0AZC by Yuxuan

Yuxuan — Fri, 14 Dec 2018 02:08:20 GMT

You missed a $after$ \dim (f(Z)).

#3837 on tag 01LS by anonymous

anonymous — Thu, 13 Dec 2018 06:33:07 GMT

This refers to Tag 01LR just above. It seems that the f on the right hand side should be the morphism making T into an S-scheme. So my suggestion is to write $(f \colon T \rightarrow S) \mapsto \{\text{$ \phi $as above}\}$ . (The right hand side should be in "set brackets" but it did not work in the preview.) In the representability statements below it would be good to say representable by an S-scheme.

#3836 on tag 02X4 by slogan_bot

slogan_bot — Thu, 13 Dec 2018 05:46:31 GMT

Suggested slogan: "The diagonal of any algebraic space is a separated, locally quasi-finite monomorphism"

#3833 on tag 081I by slogan_bot

slogan_bot — Tue, 11 Dec 2018 04:17:06 GMT

Suggested slogan: "Schme theoretic image of a quasi-compact morphism commutes with flat base change"

#3832 on tag 0DYE by slogan_bot

slogan_bot — Sat, 08 Dec 2018 05:56:52 GMT

Suggested slogan: "Henselization commutes with base change along integral maps"

#3831 on tag 0F0L by slogan_bot

slogan_bot — Sat, 08 Dec 2018 05:54:36 GMT

Suggested slogan: "The Henselization of a pair only depends on the radical of the ideal"

#3830 on tag 0AGV by slogan_bot

slogan_bot — Sat, 08 Dec 2018 05:52:39 GMT

Suggested slogan: "Henselization of a Noetherian pair is Noetherian and does not affect completions"

#3829 on tag 0AG8 by Antoine VEZIER

Antoine VEZIER — Fri, 07 Dec 2018 08:03:03 GMT

Small typo on line 5 I think. It is a_i, h\in A and not h_i, h\in A.