Stacks project -- Comments https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/recent-comments.xml Stacks project, see https://stacks.math.columbia.edu en stacks.project@gmail.com (The Stacks project) pieterbelmans@gmail.com (Pieter Belmans) https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/static/stacks.png Stacks project -- Comments https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/recent-comments.rss #6998 on tag 05YU by Johan https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/05YU#comment-6998 A new comment by Johan on tag 05YU. Yes, see Proposition 69.15.2.

]]>
Johan Thu, 27 Jan 2022 01:09:30 GMT
#6997 on tag 05YU by Laurent Moret-Bailly https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/05YU#comment-6997 A new comment by Laurent Moret-Bailly on tag 05YU. Could this be true if $S$ is only assumed to be an algebraic space? I could not find this in later chapters.

]]>
Laurent Moret-Bailly Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:36:12 GMT
#6994 on tag 0B88 by Laurent Moret-Bailly https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0B88#comment-6994 A new comment by Laurent Moret-Bailly on tag 0B88. Condition (3): "are contained" should be "is contained".

]]>
Laurent Moret-Bailly Wed, 26 Jan 2022 01:03:43 GMT
#6993 on tag 0BA7 by Laurent Moret-Bailly https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0BA7#comment-6993 A new comment by Laurent Moret-Bailly on tag 0BA7. Typo: "Let $k$ be finite field".

]]>
Laurent Moret-Bailly Wed, 26 Jan 2022 01:01:06 GMT
#6992 on tag 0DDF by Johan https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0DDF#comment-6992 A new comment by Johan on tag 0DDF. Yes

]]>
Johan Wed, 26 Jan 2022 12:42:35 GMT
#6991 on tag 0DDF by Marco https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0DDF#comment-6991 A new comment by Marco on tag 0DDF. Are you sure that we don't need that $\mathcal{F}$ has no $p$-torsion where $p$ is the characteristic of the residue field over the point $y$ in order to conclude (1)?

]]>
Marco Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:48:38 GMT
#6990 on tag 0118 by Johan https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0118#comment-6990 A new comment by Johan on tag 0118. OK, thanks for getting back to me.

]]>
Johan Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:18:30 GMT
#6989 on tag 0118 by Seongsu Jeon https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0118#comment-6989 A new comment by Seongsu Jeon on tag 0118. What I meant was $i = n$. But, I understood the statement is true. Thanks!

]]>
Seongsu Jeon Wed, 26 Jan 2022 12:37:17 GMT
#6988 on tag 00QM by Zhouhang Mᴀᴏ https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00QM#comment-6988 A new comment by Zhouhang Mᴀᴏ on tag 00QM. In the definitions, it might be better to change the article: a localization of ..., since the multiplicative subset is unspecific (this article is used, say, in Weibel's book for the definition of essentially of finite type).

]]>
Zhouhang Mᴀᴏ Tue, 25 Jan 2022 03:09:53 GMT
#6987 on tag 07Z5 by Xiaolong Liu https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/07Z5#comment-6987 A new comment by Xiaolong Liu on tag 07Z5. Replace '$x$' by '$m$' in the proof.

]]>
Xiaolong Liu Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:05:17 GMT