Stacks project -- Comments https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/recent-comments.xml Stacks project, see https://stacks.math.columbia.edu en stacks.project@gmail.com (The Stacks project) pieterbelmans@gmail.com (Pieter Belmans) https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/static/stacks.png Stacks project -- Comments https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/recent-comments.rss #6651 on tag 04PQ by 七海辣辣米 https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/04PQ#comment-6651 A new comment by 七海辣辣米 on tag 04PQ. In lemma 04PU, the first line, 'by going up' should be 'by going down'.

]]>
七海辣辣米 Wed, 20 Oct 2021 04:02:06 GMT
#6650 on tag 00L9 by Likun Xie https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00L9#comment-6650 A new comment by Likun Xie on tag 00L9. Lemma 10.63.13, don't we need to be finite over ? Proposition 10.63.6 is for finite module.

]]>
Likun Xie Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:42:28 GMT
#6649 on tag 0FWI by Media Online https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FWI#comment-6649 A new comment by Media Online on tag 0FWI. pelajaran apa ini gak paham aku \ref{https://en.gravatar.com/galuhmaheswara/}

]]>
Media Online Tue, 19 Oct 2021 06:11:35 GMT
#6648 on tag 04PS by 七海辣辣米 https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/04PS#comment-6648 A new comment by 七海辣辣米 on tag 04PS. In lemma 04PS, the first paragraph, there is a missed 0 in the second exact sequence.

]]>
七海辣辣米 Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:14:16 GMT
#6647 on tag 087S by Phoebe https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/087S#comment-6647 A new comment by Phoebe on tag 087S. Oh I was being stupid. I get it now. You can delete my comments.

]]>
Phoebe Tue, 12 Oct 2021 07:28:57 GMT
#6646 on tag 087S by Phoebe https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/087S#comment-6646 A new comment by Phoebe on tag 087S. Why does follow from Lemma 27.20.1?

]]>
Phoebe Tue, 12 Oct 2021 05:09:45 GMT
#6645 on tag 0B8Y by Laurent Moret-Bailly https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0B8Y#comment-6645 A new comment by Laurent Moret-Bailly on tag 0B8Y. For condition (6) one could of course weaken the assumption "If is perfect" to "If is separable".

]]>
Laurent Moret-Bailly Tue, 12 Oct 2021 02:14:20 GMT
#6644 on tag 0B73 by WhatJiaranEatsTonight https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0B73#comment-6644 A new comment by WhatJiaranEatsTonight on tag 0B73. In the last row of the statement, gysin map should be Gysin map.

]]>
WhatJiaranEatsTonight Sat, 09 Oct 2021 02:48:47 GMT
#6643 on tag 02TM by WhatJiaranEatsTonight https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/02TM#comment-6643 A new comment by WhatJiaranEatsTonight on tag 02TM. I think the equation in the statement should be . Otherwise, the element in the right is an element in .(Though they are equal in the cycle level.)

]]>
WhatJiaranEatsTonight Sat, 09 Oct 2021 02:26:35 GMT
#6642 on tag 02SU by WhatJiaranEatsTonight https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/02SU#comment-6642 A new comment by WhatJiaranEatsTonight on tag 02SU. I do not know why it need to construct and . Can we reduce the conclusion to integral merely by the linearity of two sides of the equation?

Does the requirement of the cycles to be "locally finite" but not "finite" matter?

]]>
WhatJiaranEatsTonight Fri, 08 Oct 2021 07:48:49 GMT