Recent comments
There are currently 2660 comments. You are now displaying comments 0 to 20 in reverse chronological order.
- On August 15 Sándor Kovács left comment 2769 on tag 0687
Shouldn't this be Lemma 36.50.1?
- On August 11 sdf left comment 2768 on tag 01KP
Yes I didn't read it properly, apologies.
- On August 11 sdf left comment 2767 on tag 02JQ
There is a fairly standard notation of $\mathrm{ff}$ or $\mathrm{FF}$ or $\mathrm{FoF}$ for field of...
- On August 11 BCnrd left comment 2766 on tag 02JQ
Dario's suggestion of $\kappa(\mathfrak{p})$ for the fraction field of $A/\mathfrak{p}$ seems fine s...
- On August 10 Dario Weißmann left comment 2765 on tag 02JQ
Why not use the notation $Q(-)$ introduced in Example 10.9.8 (3)? Or - as in this case we are talki...
- On August 10 Dario Weißmann left comment 2764 on tag 08XU
This result is also stated in Lemma 19.2.6, is this intentional? In Lemma 19.2.6 (or rather direct...
- On August 10 BCnrd left comment 2763 on tag 0APG
To prove the instance of (34.15.0.1) that is relevant in this proof, namely $\{U_i\}$ an inverse sys...
- On August 10 BCnrd left comment 2762 on tag 02JQ
The notation $f.f.$ to denote "fraction field" (twice) near the end of the proof seems kind of awful...
- On August 6 Anonymous left comment 2761 on tag 03AG
Typos? On this page both $\mathcal{G}$ and $G$ are repeatedly used for what (I think) should be the...
- On August 5 Anonymous left comment 2760 on tag 07FE
Towards the end of the proof it should say $R_\mathfrak{p} \rightarrow \Lambda_\mathfrak{q}$ is flat...
- On August 4 Anonymous left comment 2759 on tag 07F1
In 16.8.3 first paragraph, it should read "... $A_S \rightarrow B'$ is given by ..." In 16.8.4 se...
- On August 3 Ko Aoki left comment 2758 on tag 0B0D
Typo in the first line: "a $s$ cycle $\beta$" should be replaced by "an $s$-cycle $\beta$".
- On August 3 Ariyan Javanpeykar left comment 2757 on tag 06PL
Slogan: Gerbes are algebraic if and only if the associated groups are flat and locally of finite pre...
- On August 3 Kestutis Cesnavicius left comment 2756 on tag 053E
For the sake of keeping track of references, it may be worthwhile to mention that part (1) of this l...
- On August 2 Johan left comment 2755 on tag 072J
Dear Denis Lieberman, actually here we only do elliptic curves and hence we get schemes.
- On August 2 denis lieberman left comment 2754 on tag 072J
E in the triple appearing in the first line is not a scheme but a Deligne- Rapoport (DR) semistable...
- On August 2 Anonymous left comment 2753 on tag 07CR
And right after that, one has to mod out all $f_1,\dots,f_m$ in $B$.
- On August 2 Anonymous left comment 2752 on tag 07CR
After introducing the $h_i$ it should read $ f_j = f_j(x_1-h_1,\dots,x_n-h_n) = \pi^2 ...
- On August 2 Takumi Murayama left comment 2751 on tag 01TD
Added the reference; thanks!
- On August 2 Takumi Murayama left comment 2750 on tag 02O3
Added the reference (to the Proposition); thanks!