The Stacks project

Lemma 17.28.11. Let $(f, f^\sharp ) : (X, \mathcal{O}_ X) \to (S, \mathcal{O}_ S)$ be a morphism of ringed spaces. Consider a short exact sequence

\[ 0 \to \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{O}_ X \to 0 \]

Here $\mathcal{A}$ is a sheaf of $f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_ S$-algebras, $\pi : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{O}_ X$ is a surjection of sheaves of $f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_ S$-algebras, and $\mathcal{I} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\pi )$ is its kernel. Assume $\mathcal{I}$ an ideal sheaf with square zero in $\mathcal{A}$. So $\mathcal{I}$ has a natural structure of an $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. A section $s : \mathcal{O}_ X \to \mathcal{A}$ of $\pi $ is a $f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_ S$-algebra map such that $\pi \circ s = \text{id}$. Given any section $s : \mathcal{O}_ X \to \mathcal{A}$ of $\pi $ and any $S$-derivation $D : \mathcal{O}_ X \to \mathcal{I}$ the map

\[ s + D : \mathcal{O}_ X \to \mathcal{A} \]

is a section of $\pi $ and every section $s'$ is of the form $s + D$ for a unique $S$-derivation $D$.

Proof. Recall that the $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module structure on $\mathcal{I}$ is given by $h \tau = \tilde h \tau $ (multiplication in $\mathcal{A}$) where $h$ is a local section of $\mathcal{O}_ X$, and $\tilde h$ is a local lift of $h$ to a local section of $\mathcal{A}$, and $\tau $ is a local section of $\mathcal{I}$. In particular, given $s$, we may use $\tilde h = s(h)$. To verify that $s + D$ is a homomorphism of sheaves of rings we compute

\begin{eqnarray*} (s + D)(ab) & = & s(ab) + D(ab) \\ & = & s(a)s(b) + aD(b) + D(a)b \\ & = & s(a) s(b) + s(a)D(b) + D(a)s(b) \\ & = & (s(a) + D(a))(s(b) + D(b)) \end{eqnarray*}

by the Leibniz rule. In the same manner one shows $s + D$ is a $f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_ S$-algebra map because $D$ is an $S$-derivation. Conversely, given $s'$ we set $D = s' - s$. Details omitted. $\square$


Comments (3)

Comment #789 by Anfang Zhou on

Typo.In the statement of this lemma, it should be "Given any section ".

Comment #8565 by on

Instead of this lemma, one could prove the following more general result and obtain Lemma 17.28.11 as a Corollary:

Lemma. Let be a topological space, let be a sheaf of rings over and let be sheaves of -algebras. Suppose is an ideal sheaf with . Then is naturally a -module. Let be a morphism of -algebras ( becomes an -module via ). Denote to the set of -algebra homomorphisms that lift to . Then is a -torsor via

Proof. The map is well-defined: It is clear that is -linear, that it preserves the multiplicative unit and that as a map of sheaves of abelian groups, it's a lifting of to . It is left to show that is multiplicative. For this, we need first to prove the following: Let , and let be local sections respectively of and of , over the same open subset . Then we claim that , i.e., that . It suffices to verify the equality on germs at , and we leave this as an exercise to the reader (use the natural -module structure on ). Now, one has Thus, and the map from the statement constitutes a group action of on . It is clear that the action is free. To show transitivity, let . We have to show that . On the one hand, it is clear that is -linear. On the other hand, using the same facts as in the last computation, we get which shows Leibniz's rule for .

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 17.28: Modules of differentials

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 01UP. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.