## Tag `02LS`

Chapter 36: More on Morphisms > Section 36.38: Zariski's Main Theorem

Lemma 36.38.4. Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. The following are equivalent:

- $f$ is finite,
- $f$ is proper with finite fibres,
- $f$ is proper and locally quasi-finite,
- $f$ is universally closed, separated, locally of finite type and has finite fibres.

Proof.We have (1) implies (2) by Morphisms, Lemmas 28.42.10, 28.19.10, and 28.42.9. We have (2) implies (3) by Morphisms, Lemma 28.19.7. We have (3) implies (4) by the definition of proper morphisms and Morphisms, Lemmas 28.19.9 and 28.19.10.Assume (3). Pick $s \in S$. By Morphisms, Lemma 28.19.7 we see that all the finitely many points of $X_s$ are isolated in $X_s$. Choose an elementary étale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$ and decomposition $X_U = V \amalg W$ as in Lemma 36.36.6. Note that $W_u = \emptyset$ because all points of $X_s$ are isolated. Since $f$ is universally closed we see that the image of $W$ in $U$ is a closed set not containing $u$. After shrinking $U$ we may assume that $W = \emptyset$. In other words we see that $X_U = V$ is finite over $U$. Since $s \in S$ was arbitrary this means there exists a family $\{U_i \to S\}$ of étale morphisms whose images cover $S$ such that the base changes $X_{U_i} \to U_i$ are finite. Note that $\{U_i \to S\}$ is an étale covering, see Topologies, Definition 33.4.1. Hence it is an fpqc covering, see Topologies, Lemma 33.9.6. Hence we conclude $f$ is finite by Descent, Lemma 34.20.23. $\square$

The code snippet corresponding to this tag is a part of the file `more-morphisms.tex` and is located in lines 10650–10661 (see updates for more information).

```
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-characterize-finite}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
The following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is finite,
\item $f$ is proper with finite fibres,
\item $f$ is proper and locally quasi-finite,
\item $f$ is universally closed, separated, locally of finite type
and has finite fibres.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
We have (1) implies (2) by
Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-proper},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite},
and \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-quasi-finite}.
We have (2) implies (3) by Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-fibre}.
We have (3) implies (4) by the definition of proper morphisms and
Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite-locally-quasi-compact} and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite}.
\medskip\noindent
Assume (3). Pick $s \in S$. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-fibre} we
see that all the finitely many points of $X_s$ are isolated in $X_s$.
Choose an elementary \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$
and decomposition $X_U = V \amalg W$ as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-splits-off-quasi-finite-part}.
Note that $W_u = \emptyset$ because all points of $X_s$ are isolated.
Since $f$ is universally closed we see that
the image of $W$ in $U$ is a closed set not containing $u$.
After shrinking $U$ we may assume that $W = \emptyset$.
In other words we see that $X_U = V$ is finite over $U$.
Since $s \in S$ was arbitrary
this means there exists a family $\{U_i \to S\}$
of \'etale morphisms whose images cover $S$ such that
the base changes $X_{U_i} \to U_i$ are finite.
Note that $\{U_i \to S\}$ is an \'etale covering,
see Topologies, Definition \ref{topologies-definition-etale-covering}.
Hence it is an fpqc covering, see
Topologies,
Lemma \ref{topologies-lemma-zariski-etale-smooth-syntomic-fppf-fpqc}.
Hence we conclude $f$ is finite by
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-property-finite}.
\end{proof}
```

## Comments (0)

## Add a comment on tag `02LS`

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the lower-right corner).

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

There are no comments yet for this tag.

There is also 1 comment on Section 36.38: More on Morphisms.