42.18 Principal divisors and pushforward
The first lemma implies that the pushforward of a principal divisor along a generically finite morphism is a principal divisor.
Lemma 42.18.1. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X, Y be locally of finite type over S. Assume X, Y are integral and n = \dim _\delta (X) = \dim _\delta (Y). Let p : X \to Y be a dominant proper morphism. Let f \in R(X)^*. Set
g = \text{Nm}_{R(X)/R(Y)}(f).
Then we have p_*\text{div}(f) = \text{div}(g).
Proof.
Let Z \subset Y be an integral closed subscheme of \delta -dimension n - 1. We want to show that the coefficient of [Z] in p_*\text{div}(f) and \text{div}(g) are equal. We may apply Lemma 42.16.2 to the morphism p : X \to Y and the generic point \xi \in Z. Hence we may replace Y by an affine open neighbourhood of \xi and assume that p : X \to Y is finite. Write Y = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) and X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) with p induced by a finite homomorphism R \to A of Noetherian domains which induces an finite field extension L/K of fraction fields. Now we have f \in L, g = \text{Nm}(f) \in K, and a prime \mathfrak p \subset R with \dim (R_{\mathfrak p}) = 1. The coefficient of [Z] in \text{div}_ Y(g) is \text{ord}_{R_\mathfrak p}(g). The coefficient of [Z] in p_*\text{div}_ X(f) is
\sum \nolimits _{\mathfrak q\text{ lying over }\mathfrak p} [\kappa (\mathfrak q) : \kappa (\mathfrak p)] \text{ord}_{A_{\mathfrak q}}(f)
The desired equality therefore follows from Algebra, Lemma 10.121.8.
\square
An important role in the discussion of principal divisors is played by the “universal” principal divisor [0] - [\infty ] on \mathbf{P}^1_ S. To make this more precise, let us denote
42.18.1.1
\begin{equation} \label{chow-equation-zero-infty} D_0, D_\infty \subset \mathbf{P}^1_ S = \underline{\text{Proj}}_ S(\mathcal{O}_ S[T_0, T_1]) \end{equation}
the closed subscheme cut out by the section T_1, resp. T_0 of \mathcal{O}(1). These are effective Cartier divisors, see Divisors, Definition 31.13.1 and Lemma 31.14.10. The following lemma says that loosely speaking we have “\text{div}(T_1/T_0) = [D_0] - [D_1]” and that this is the universal principal divisor.
Lemma 42.18.2. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be locally of finite type over S. Assume X is integral and n = \dim _\delta (X). Let f \in R(X)^*. Let U \subset X be a nonempty open such that f corresponds to a section f \in \Gamma (U, \mathcal{O}_ X^*). Let Y \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S be the closure of the graph of f : U \to \mathbf{P}^1_ S. Then
the projection morphism p : Y \to X is proper,
p|_{p^{-1}(U)} : p^{-1}(U) \to U is an isomorphism,
the pullbacks Y_0 = q^{-1}D_0 and Y_\infty = q^{-1}D_\infty via the morphism q : Y \to \mathbf{P}^1_ S are defined (Divisors, Definition 31.13.12),
we have
\text{div}_ Y(f) = [Y_0]_{n - 1} - [Y_\infty ]_{n - 1}
we have
\text{div}_ X(f) = p_*\text{div}_ Y(f)
if we view Y_0 and Y_\infty as closed subschemes of X via the morphism p then we have
\text{div}_ X(f) = [Y_0]_{n - 1} - [Y_\infty ]_{n - 1}
Proof.
Since X is integral, we see that U is integral. Hence Y is integral, and (1, f)(U) \subset Y is an open dense subscheme. Also, note that the closed subscheme Y \subset X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S does not depend on the choice of the open U, since after all it is the closure of the one point set \{ \eta '\} = \{ (1, f)(\eta )\} where \eta \in X is the generic point. Having said this let us prove the assertions of the lemma.
For (1) note that p is the composition of the closed immersion Y \to X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S = \mathbf{P}^1_ X with the proper morphism \mathbf{P}^1_ X \to X. As a composition of proper morphisms is proper (Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.4) we conclude.
It is clear that Y \cap U \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S = (1, f)(U). Thus (2) follows. It also follows that \dim _\delta (Y) = n.
Note that q(\eta ') = f(\eta ) is not contained in D_0 or D_\infty since f \in R(X)^*. Hence (3) by Divisors, Lemma 31.13.13. We obtain \dim _\delta (Y_0) = n - 1 and \dim _\delta (Y_\infty ) = n - 1 from Lemma 42.16.1.
Consider the effective Cartier divisor Y_0. At every point \xi \in Y_0 we have f \in \mathcal{O}_{Y, \xi } and the local equation for Y_0 is given by f. In particular, if \delta (\xi ) = n - 1 so \xi is the generic point of a integral closed subscheme Z of \delta -dimension n - 1, then we see that the coefficient of [Z] in \text{div}_ Y(f) is
\text{ord}_ Z(f) = \text{length}_{\mathcal{O}_{Y, \xi }} (\mathcal{O}_{Y, \xi }/f\mathcal{O}_{Y, \xi }) = \text{length}_{\mathcal{O}_{Y, \xi }} (\mathcal{O}_{Y_0, \xi })
which is the coefficient of [Z] in [Y_0]_{n - 1}. A similar argument using the rational function 1/f shows that -[Y_\infty ] agrees with the terms with negative coefficients in the expression for \text{div}_ Y(f). Hence (4) follows.
Note that D_0 \to S is an isomorphism. Hence we see that X \times _ S D_0 \to X is an isomorphism as well. Clearly we have Y_0 = Y \cap X \times _ S D_0 (scheme theoretic intersection) inside X \times _ S \mathbf{P}^1_ S. Hence it is really the case that Y_0 \to X is a closed immersion. It follows that
p_*\mathcal{O}_{Y_0} = \mathcal{O}_{Y'_0}
where Y'_0 \subset X is the image of Y_0 \to X. By Lemma 42.12.4 we have p_*[Y_0]_{n - 1} = [Y'_0]_{n - 1}. The same is true for D_\infty and Y_\infty . Hence (6) is a consequence of (5). Finally, (5) follows immediately from Lemma 42.18.1.
\square
The following lemma says that the degree of a principal divisor on a proper curve is zero.
Lemma 42.18.3. Let K be any field. Let X be a 1-dimensional integral scheme endowed with a proper morphism c : X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K). Let f \in K(X)^* be an invertible rational function. Then
\sum \nolimits _{x \in X \text{ closed}} [\kappa (x) : K] \text{ord}_{\mathcal{O}_{X, x}}(f) = 0
where \text{ord} is as in Algebra, Definition 10.121.2. In other words, c_*\text{div}(f) = 0.
Proof.
Consider the diagram
\xymatrix{ Y \ar[r]_ p \ar[d]_ q & X \ar[d]^ c \\ \mathbf{P}^1_ K \ar[r]^-{c'} & \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) }
that we constructed in Lemma 42.18.2 starting with X and the rational function f over S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K). We will use all the results of this lemma without further mention. We have to show that c_*\text{div}_ X(f) = c_*p_*\text{div}_ Y(f) = 0. This is the same as proving that c'_*q_*\text{div}_ Y(f) = 0. If q(Y) is a closed point of \mathbf{P}^1_ K then we see that \text{div}_ X(f) = 0 and the lemma holds. Thus we may assume that q is dominant. Suppose we can show that q : Y \to \mathbf{P}^1_ K is finite locally free of degree d (see Morphisms, Definition 29.48.1). Since \text{div}_ Y(f) = [q^{-1}D_0]_0 - [q^{-1}D_\infty ]_0 we see (by definition of flat pullback) that \text{div}_ Y(f) = q^*([D_0]_0 - [D_\infty ]_0). Then by Lemma 42.15.2 we get q_*\text{div}_ Y(f) = d([D_0]_0 - [D_\infty ]_0). Since clearly c'_*[D_0]_0 = c'_*[D_\infty ]_0 we win.
It remains to show that q is finite locally free. (It will automatically have some given degree as \mathbf{P}^1_ K is connected.) Since \dim (\mathbf{P}^1_ K) = 1 we see that q is finite for example by Lemma 42.16.2. All local rings of \mathbf{P}^1_ K at closed points are regular local rings of dimension 1 (in other words discrete valuation rings), since they are localizations of K[T] (see Algebra, Lemma 10.114.1). Hence for y\in Y closed the local ring \mathcal{O}_{Y, y} will be flat over \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^1_ K, q(y)} as soon as it is torsion free (More on Algebra, Lemma 15.22.11). This is obviously the case as \mathcal{O}_{Y, y} is a domain and q is dominant. Thus q is flat. Hence q is finite locally free by Morphisms, Lemma 29.48.2.
\square
Comments (0)