The Stacks Project


Tag: 036N

This tag has label descent-lemma-locally-finite-presentation-fppf-local-source and it points to

The corresponding content:

Lemma 31.24.1. The property $\mathcal{P}(f)=$''$f$ is locally of finite presentation'' is fppf local on the source.

Proof. Being locally of finite presentation is Zariski local on the source and the target, see Morphisms, Lemma 25.22.2. It is a property which is preserved under composition, see Morphisms, Lemma 25.22.3. This proves (1), (2) and (3) of Lemma 31.22.3. The final condition (4) is Lemma 31.10.1. Hence we win. $\square$

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-locally-finite-presentation-fppf-local-source}
The property $\mathcal{P}(f)=$``$f$ is locally of finite presentation''
is fppf local on the source.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Being locally of finite presentation is Zariski local on the source
and the target, see Morphisms,
Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-finite-presentation-characterize}.
It is a property which is preserved under composition, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-composition-finite-presentation}.
This proves
(1), (2) and (3) of Lemma \ref{lemma-properties-morphisms-local-source}.
The final condition (4) is
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-finitely-presented-permanence-algebra}. Hence we win.
\end{proof}
    

To cite this tag (see How to reference tags), use:

\cite[\href{http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/036N}{Tag 036N}]{stacks-project}

Comments (0)

There are no comments yet for this tag.

Add a comment on tag 036N

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the lower-right corner).




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following box. So in case this is tag 0321 you just have to write 0321. This captcha seems more appropriate than the usual illegible gibberish, right?