The Stacks Project


Tag: 04RY

This tag has label spaces-more-groupoids-lemma-quasi-splitting-scheme and it points to

The corresponding content:

Lemma 56.11.7. Assumptions and notation as in Situation 56.11.3. Assume in addition that $s, t$ are flat and locally of finite presentation. Then there exists a scheme $U'$, a separated étale morphism $U' \to U$, and a point $u' \in U'$ lying over $u$ with $\kappa(u) = \kappa(u')$ such that the restriction $R' = R|_{U'}$ of $R$ to $U'$ is quasi-split over $u'$.

Proof. This follows from the construction of $U'$ in the proof of Lemma 56.11.5 because in this case $U' = (R_s/U, e)_{fin}$ is a scheme separated over $U$ by Lemmas 56.8.14 and 56.8.15. $\square$

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-quasi-splitting-scheme}
Assumptions and notation as in
Situation \ref{situation-etale-localize-quasi}.
Assume in addition that $s, t$ are flat and locally of finite presentation.
Then there exists a scheme $U'$, a separated \'etale morphism
$U' \to U$, and a point $u' \in U'$ lying over $u$ with
$\kappa(u) = \kappa(u')$ such that the restriction $R' = R|_{U'}$ of
$R$ to $U'$ is quasi-split over $u'$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This follows from the construction of $U'$ in the proof of
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-splitting-general}
because in this case $U' = (R_s/U, e)_{fin}$ is a scheme separated
over $U$ by
Lemmas \ref{lemma-finite-separated-flat-locally-finite-presentation} and
\ref{lemma-finite-plus-section}.
\end{proof}
    

To cite this tag (see How to reference tags), use:

\cite[\href{http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/04RY}{Tag 04RY}]{stacks-project}

Comments (0)

There are no comments yet for this tag.

Add a comment on tag 04RY

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the lower-right corner).




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following box. So in case this is tag 0321 you just have to write 0321. This captcha seems more appropriate than the usual illegible gibberish, right?