The Stacks project

24.19 Localization and sheaves of differential graded modules

Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Let $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$ and denote

\[ j : (\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}/U), \mathcal{O}_ U) \longrightarrow (\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}), \mathcal{O}) \]

the corresponding localization morphism (Modules on Sites, Section 18.19). Below we will use the following fact: for $\mathcal{O}_ U$-modules $\mathcal{M}_ i$, $i = 1, 2$ and a $\mathcal{O}$-module $\mathcal{A}$ there is a canonical map

\[ j_! : \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{O}_ U}( \mathcal{M}_1 \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ U} \mathcal{A}|_ U, \mathcal{M}_2) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {O}( j_!\mathcal{M}_1 \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{A}, j_!\mathcal{M}_2) \]

Namely, we have $j_!(\mathcal{M}_1 \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ U} \mathcal{A}|_ U) = j_!\mathcal{M}_1 \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{A}$ by Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.27.9.

Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a differential graded $\mathcal{O}$-algebra. We will denote $\mathcal{A}_ U$ the restriction of $\mathcal{A}$ to $\mathcal{C}/U$, in other words, we have $\mathcal{A}_ U = j^*\mathcal{A} = j^{-1}\mathcal{A}$. In Section 24.18 we have constructed adjoint functors

\[ j_* : \textit{Mod}^{dg}(\mathcal{A}_ U, \text{d}) \longrightarrow \textit{Mod}^{dg}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}) \quad \text{and}\quad j^* : \textit{Mod}^{dg}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}) \longrightarrow \textit{Mod}^{dg}(\mathcal{A}_ U, \text{d}) \]

with $j^*$ left adjoint to $j_*$. We claim there is in addition an exact functor

\[ j_! : \textit{Mod}^{dg}(\mathcal{A}_ U, \text{d}) \longrightarrow \textit{Mod}^{dg}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}) \]

right adjoint to $j_*$. Namely, given a differential graded $\mathcal{A}_ U$-module $\mathcal{M}$ we define $j_!\mathcal{M}$ to be the graded $\mathcal{A}$-module constructed in Section 24.10 with differentials $j_!\text{d} : j_!\mathcal{M}^ n \to j_!\mathcal{M}^{n + 1}$. Given a homogeneous map $f : \mathcal{M} \to \mathcal{M}'$ of degree $n$ of differential graded $\mathcal{A}_ U$-modules, we obtain a homogeneous map $j_!f : j_!\mathcal{M} \to j_!\mathcal{M}'$ of degree $n$ of differential graded $\mathcal{A}$-modules. We omit the straightforward verification that this construction is compatible with differentials. Thus we obtain our functor.

Lemma 24.19.1. In the situation above we have

\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\textit{Mod}^{dg}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})}( j_!\mathcal{M}, \mathcal{N}) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\textit{Mod}^{dg}(\mathcal{A}_ U, \text{d})}( \mathcal{M}, j^*\mathcal{N}) \]

Proof. Omitted. Hint: We have seen in Lemma 24.10.1 that the lemma is true on graded level. Thus all that needs to be checked is that the resulting isomorphism is compatible with differentials. $\square$

Lemma 24.19.2. In the situation above, let $\mathcal{M}$ be a right differential graded $\mathcal{A}_ U$-module and let $\mathcal{N}$ be a left differential graded $\mathcal{A}$-module. Then

\[ j_!\mathcal{M} \otimes _\mathcal {A} \mathcal{N} = j_!(\mathcal{M} \otimes _{\mathcal{A}_ U} \mathcal{N}|_ U) \]

as complexes of $\mathcal{O}$-modules functorially in $\mathcal{M}$ and $\mathcal{N}$.

Proof. As graded modules, this follows from Lemma 24.10.2. We omit the verification that this isomorphism is compatible with differentials. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0FRV. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.