History of tag 03JC
Go back to the tag's page.
type |
time |
link |
changed the statement
|
2013-05-24 |
719c185 |
LaTeX: \etale
Introduced the macro
\def\etale{{\acute{e}tale}}
and replaced all occurences of \acute{e}tale by \etale
|
changed the statement
|
2011-08-14 |
ca002a3 |
Whitespace changes
|
changed the proof
|
2011-06-21 |
09cd43a |
The open stratum which is a gerbe
A reduced algebraic stack whose inertia is quasi-compact has a
dense open stratum which is a gerbe. Completely straightforward
from everything we have so far.
|
changed the statement
|
2010-10-09 |
de2ddd0 |
Neurotic changes
Fix (almost all) complaints of parse.py
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2010-10-09 |
2b090dd |
End conversion of etale to \'etale.
|
changed the proof
|
2010-05-17 |
9206d4e |
More Groupoids: small changes
Also divided up the material on quotient stacks to get better
readability.
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2010-05-17 |
29e9528 |
More groupoids: Small change
|
moved the statement to file more-groupoids.tex
|
2010-05-14 |
753a2b1 |
Groupoids: Put advanced material on groupoids in separated chapter
We will rewrite the technical lemmas, the slicing lemma, and
etale localization lemmas in order to fix errors and for
clarity.
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2010-05-14 |
753a2b1 |
Groupoids: Put advanced material on groupoids in separated chapter
We will rewrite the technical lemmas, the slicing lemma, and
etale localization lemmas in order to fix errors and for
clarity.
|
assigned tag 03JC
|
2009-11-08 |
65620d4
|
Tags: New tags added
|
created statement with label lemma-property-invariant in groupoids.tex
|
2009-10-26 |
97b4c1b |
Groupoids: Locus where s, t have a property is invariant
Given a groupoid (U, R, s, t, c) the open subset of U over which
s, t have a given property P of morphisms of schemes is
R-invariant provided this property is tau-local on the base and
s, t define tau-coverings.
There is a potential for misuse here, and in some other places
where the statement of a lemma depends on knowing what a
covering is. Namely, some authors have a different definition of
what constitutes a covering. For example in some places in the
literature the ring map
k[x] ---> k[x] \times k[x]/(x)
may be said to define an fppf covering, whereas we do not allow
this...
|