Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

The Stacks project

History of tag 03JC

Go back to the tag's page.

type time link
changed the statement 2013-05-24 719c185
LaTeX: \etale

Introduced the macro

\def\etale{{\acute{e}tale}}

and replaced all occurences of \acute{e}tale by \etale
changed the statement 2011-08-14 ca002a3
Whitespace changes
changed the proof 2011-06-21 09cd43a
The open stratum which is a gerbe

	A reduced algebraic stack whose inertia is quasi-compact has a
	dense open stratum which is a gerbe. Completely straightforward
	from everything we have so far.
changed the statement 2010-10-09 de2ddd0
Neurotic changes

	Fix (almost all) complaints of parse.py
changed the statement and the proof 2010-10-09 2b090dd
End conversion of etale to \'etale.
changed the proof 2010-05-17 9206d4e
More Groupoids: small changes

	Also divided up the material on quotient stacks to get better
	readability.
changed the statement and the proof 2010-05-17 29e9528
More groupoids: Small change
moved the statement to file more-groupoids.tex 2010-05-14 753a2b1
Groupoids: Put advanced material on groupoids in separated chapter

	We will rewrite the technical lemmas, the slicing lemma, and
	etale localization lemmas in order to fix errors and for
	clarity.
changed the statement and the proof 2010-05-14 753a2b1
Groupoids: Put advanced material on groupoids in separated chapter

	We will rewrite the technical lemmas, the slicing lemma, and
	etale localization lemmas in order to fix errors and for
	clarity.
assigned tag 03JC 2009-11-08 65620d4
Tags: New tags added
created statement with label lemma-property-invariant in groupoids.tex 2009-10-26 97b4c1b
Groupoids: Locus where s, t have a property is invariant

	Given a groupoid (U, R, s, t, c) the open subset of U over which
	s, t have a given property P of morphisms of schemes is
	R-invariant provided this property is tau-local on the base and
	s, t define tau-coverings.

	There is a potential for misuse here, and in some other places
	where the statement of a lemma depends on knowing what a
	covering is. Namely, some authors have a different definition of
	what constitutes a covering. For example in some places in the
	literature the ring map

		k[x] ---> k[x] \times k[x]/(x)

	may be said to define an fppf covering, whereas we do not allow
	this...