The Stacks project

37.54 Generic flatness stratification

We can use generic flatness to construct a stratification of the base such that a given module becomes flat over the strata.

Lemma 37.54.1 (Generic flatness stratification). Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of finite presentation between quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be an $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module of finite presentation. Then there exists a $t \geq 0$ and closed subschemes

\[ S \supset S_0 \supset S_1 \supset \ldots \supset S_ t = \emptyset \]

such that $S_ i \to S$ is defined by a finite type ideal sheaf, $S_0 \subset S$ is a thickening, and $\mathcal{F}$ pulled back to $X \times _ S (S_ i \setminus S_{i + 1})$ is flat over $S_ i \setminus S_{i + 1}$.

Proof. We can find a cartesian diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ X \ar[d] \ar[r] & X_0 \ar[d] \\ S \ar[r] & S_0 } \]

and a finitely presented $\mathcal{O}_{X_0}$-module $\mathcal{F}_0$ which pulls back to $\mathcal{F}$ such that $X_0$ and $S_0$ are of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$. See Limits, Proposition 32.5.4 and Lemmas 32.10.1 and 32.10.2. Thus we may assume $X$ and $S$ are of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$ and $\mathcal{F}$ is a coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module.

Assume $X$ and $S$ are of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$ and $\mathcal{F}$ is a coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. In this case every quasi-coherent ideal is of finite type, hence we do not have to check the condition that $S_ i$ is cut out by a finite type ideal. Set $S_0 = S_{red}$ equal to the reduction of $S$. By generic flatness as stated in Morphisms, Proposition 29.27.2 there is a dense open $U_0 \subset S_0$ such that $\mathcal{F}$ pulled back to $X \times _ S U_0$ is flat over $U_0$. Let $S_1 \subset S_0$ be the reduced closed subscheme whose underlying closed subset is $S \setminus U_0$. We continue in this way, provided $S_1 \not= \emptyset $, to find $S_0 \supset S_1 \supset \ldots $. Because $S$ is Noetherian any descending chain of closed subsets stabilizes hence we see that $S_ t = \emptyset $ for some $t \geq 0$. $\square$

Lemma 37.54.2. Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of finite presentation between quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes. Then there exists a $t \geq 0$ and closed subschemes

\[ S \supset S_0 \supset S_1 \supset \ldots \supset S_ t = \emptyset \]

such that $S_ i \to S$ is defined by a finite type ideal sheaf, $S_0 \subset S$ is a thickening, and $X \times _ S (S_ i \setminus S_{i + 1})$ is flat over $S_ i \setminus S_{i + 1}$.

Proof. Apply Lemma 37.54.1 with $\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{O}_ X$. $\square$

Lemma 37.54.3. Let $R$ be a Noetherian domain. Let $R \to A \to B$ be finite type ring maps. Let $M$ be a finite $A$-module and let $N$ a finite $B$-module. Let $M \to N$ be an $A$-linear map. There exists an nonzero $f \in R$ such that the cokernel of $M_ f \to N_ f$ is a flat $R_ f$-module.

Proof. By replacing $M$ by the image of $M \to N$, we may assume $M \subset N$. Choose a filtration $0 = N_0 \subset N_1 \subset \ldots \subset N_ t = N$ such that $N_ i/N_{i - 1} = B/\mathfrak q_ i$ for some prime ideal $\mathfrak q_ i \subset B$, see Algebra, Lemma 10.62.1. Set $M_ i = M \cap N_ i$. Then $Q = N/M$ has a filtration by the submodules $Q_ i = N_ i/M_ i$. It suffices to prove $Q_ i/Q_{i - 1}$ becomes flat after localizing at a nonzero element of $f$ (since extensions of flat modules are flat by Algebra, Lemma 10.39.13). Since $Q_ i/Q_{i - 1}$ is isomorphic to the cokernel of the map $M_ i/M_{i - 1} \to N_ i/N_{i - 1}$, we reduce to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $B$ is a domain and $M \subset N = B$. After replacing $A$ by the image of $A$ in $B$ we may assume $A \subset B$. By generic flatness, we may assume $A$ and $B$ are flat over $R$ (Algebra, Lemma 10.118.1). It now suffices to show $M \to B$ becomes $R$-universally injective after replacing $R$ by a principal localization (Algebra, Lemma 10.82.7). By generic freeness, we can find a nonzero $g \in A$ such that $B_ g$ is a free $A_ g$-module (Algebra, Lemma 10.118.1). Thus we may choose a direct summand $M' \subset B_ g$ as an $A_ g$-module, which is finite free as an $A_ g$-module, and such that $M \to B \to B_ g$ factors through $M'$. Clearly, it suffices to show that $M \to M'$ becomes $R$-universally injective after replacing $R$ by a principal localization.

Say $M' = A_ g^{\oplus n}$. Since $M \subset M'$ is a finite $A$-module, we see that $M$ is contained in $(1/g^ m)A^{\oplus n}$ for some $m \geq 0$. After changing our basis for $M'$ we may assume $M \subset A^{\oplus n}$. Then it suffices to show that $A^{\oplus n}/M$ and $A_ g/A$ become $R$-flat after replacing $R$ by a principal localization. Namely, then $M' \to A^{\oplus n}$ and $A^{\oplus n} \to A_ g^{\oplus n}$ are universally injective by Algebra, Lemma 10.39.12 and consequently so is the composition $M \to M' = A_ g^{\oplus n}$.

By generic flatness (see reference above), we may assume the module $A^{\oplus n}/M$ is $R$-flat. For the quotient $A_ g/A$ we use the fact that

\[ A_ g/A = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits (1/g^ m)A/A \cong \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits A/g^ mA \]

and the module $A/g^ mA$ has a filtration of length $m$ whose succesive quotients are isomorphic to $A/gA$. Again by generic flatness we may assume $A/gA$ is $R$-flat and hence each $A/g^ mA$ is $R$-flat, and hence so is $A_ g/A$. $\square$

Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over a base scheme $S$. Let $Z \subset Y$ be the scheme theoretic image of $f$, see Morphisms, Section 29.6. Let $g : S' \to S$ be a morphism of schemes and let $f' : X \times _ S S' \to Y \times _ S S'$ be the base change of $f$ by $g$. It is not always true that $Z \times _ S S' \subset Y \times _ S S'$ is the scheme theoretic image of $f'$. Let us say that formation of the scheme theoretic image of $f/S$ commutes with arbitrary base change if for every $g$ as above the scheme theoretic image of $f'$ is equal to $Z \times _ S S'$.

Lemma 37.54.4. Let $S$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$ with both $X$ and $Y$ of finite presentation over $S$. Then there exists a $t \geq 0$ and closed subschemes

\[ S \supset S_0 \supset S_1 \supset \ldots \supset S_ t = \emptyset \]

with the following properties:

  1. $S_ i \to S$ is defined by a finite type ideal sheaf,

  2. $S_0 \subset S$ is a thickening, and

  3. with $T_ i = S_ i \setminus S_{i + 1}$ and $f_ i$ the base change of $f$ to $T_ i$ we have: formation of the scheme theoretic image of $f_ i/T_ i$ commutes with arbitrary base change (see discussion above the lemma).

Proof. We can find a commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ X \ar[d] \ar[r] & Y \ar[d] \ar[r] & S \ar[d] \\ U \ar[r] & V \ar[r] & W } \]

with cartesian squares such that $U$, $V$, $W$ are of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$. Namely, first write $S$ as a cofiltered limit of finite type schemes over $\mathbf{Z}$ with affine transition morphisms using Limits, Proposition 32.5.4 and then descend the morphism $X \to Y$ using Limits, Lemma 32.10.1. This reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $S$ is Noetherian. In this case every quasi-coherent ideal is of finite type, hence we do not have to check the condition that $S_ i$ is cut out by a finite type ideal. Set $S_0 = S_{red}$ equal to the reduction of $S$. Let $\eta \in S_0$ be a generic point of an irreducible component of $S_0$. By Noetherian induction on the underlying topological space of $S_0$, we may assume the result holds for any closed subscheme of $S_0$ not containing $\eta $. Thus it suffices to show that there exists an open neighbourhood $U_0 \subset S_0$ such that the base change $f_0$ of $f$ to $U_0$ has property (3).

Let $R$ be a Noetherian domain. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of finite type schemes over $R$. By the discussion in the previous paragraph it suffices to show that after replacing $R$ by $R_ g$ for some $g \in R$ nonzero and $X$, $Y$ by their base changes to $R_ g$, formation of the scheme theoretic image of $f/R$ commutes with arbitrary base change.

Let $Y = V_1 \cup \ldots V_ n$ be an affine open covering. Let $U_ i = f^{-1}(V_ i)$. If the statement is true for each of the morphisms $U_ i \to V_ i$ over $R$, then it holds for $f$. Namely, the scheme theoretic image of $U_ i \to V_ i$ is the intersection of $V_ i$ with the scheme theoretic image of $f : X \to Y$ by Morphisms, Lemma 29.6.3. Thus we may assume $Y$ is affine.

Let $X = U_1 \cup \ldots U_ n$ be an affine open covering. Then the scheme theoretic image of $X \to Y$ is the same as the scheme theoretic imge of $\coprod U_ i \to Y$. Thus we may assume $X$ is affine.

Say $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ and $Y = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)$ and $f$ corresponds to the $R$-algebra map $\varphi : A \to B$. Then the scheme theoretic image of $f$ is $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A/\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\varphi ))$ and similarly after base change (by an affine morphism, but it is enough to check for those). Thus formation of the scheme theoretic image commutes with base change if $\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\varphi \otimes _ R R') = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\varphi ) \otimes _ R R'$ for all ring maps $R \to R'$.

After replacing $R$, $A$, $B$ by $R_ g$, $A_ g$, $B_ g$ for a suitable nonzero $g$ in $R$, we may assume $A$ and $B$ are flat over $R$. By Lemma 37.54.3 we may also assume $B/A$ is a flat $R$-module. Then $0 \to \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\varphi ) \to A \to B \to B/A \to 0$ is an exact sequence of flat $R$-modules, which implies the desired base change statement. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0H3Y. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.