changed the proof
|
2022-08-12 |
fcc42c8 |
Fix a typo in algebra
Thanks to Yiming TANG
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00S0#comment-7374
|
changed the proof
|
2017-10-07 |
b262a96 |
Two typos in discussing NL
Thanks to Dario Weissmann
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00S1#comment-2789
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00S1#comment-2791
|
changed the proof
|
2015-12-15 |
5d95447 |
These maps induce the same module structure
Thanks to Yogesh More
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00S1#comment-1717
|
changed the proof
|
2015-12-15 |
f3be5f5 |
Two typos in naive cotangent section
Thanks to Yogesh More
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00S0#comment-1716
|
changed the proof
|
2015-08-05 |
f1cf877 |
Ring maps need not be of finite type
Thanks to Minseon Shin
|
changed the proof
|
2015-04-15 |
a9bdaf0 |
Improve exposition proof Tag 00S1
Thanks to Minseon Shin
|
changed the statement
|
2014-06-17 |
b283ba8 |
Typos in algebra.tex
Thanks to Keenan Kidwell
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00O2#comment-689
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/065R#comment-690
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0519#comment-691
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00S0#comment-692
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00S1#comment-693
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00S2#comment-694
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/08JZ#comment-701
|
changed the proof
|
2013-12-22 |
e179438 |
LaTeX
Introduced a macro
\def\Ker{\text{Ker}}
and replace all occurrences of \text{Ker} with \Ker
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2013-03-27 |
ba00249 |
New macro: \NL for naive cotangent complex
The naive cotangent complex is an important ingredient to several
topics discussed in the Stacks project. It deserves its own macro.
|
changed the proof
|
2013-03-16 |
3353ead |
Fix some typos and add references to new chapter
Thanks to Kiran Kedlaya
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00S0#comment-170
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2011-12-21 |
6bcc83f |
Improve section on naive cotangent complex
In two ways:
-- handle non-finite type maps
-- use the canonical presentation A[B] ---> B in order
to define some definite version of the complex.
|
changed the proof
|
2011-08-13 |
4ea0b65 |
Whitespace changes
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2011-06-23 |
5dd8964 |
The category C_\Lambda
This turned out to be quite a bit more interesting than I had
at first imagined. Can you do this without appealing to the
naive cotangent complex? I am sure you can, but how much longer
would it be...? Patches welcome.
|
assigned tag 00S1
|
2009-05-16 |
fad2e12
|
Started tags infrastructure
new file: scripts/add_tags.py
modified: scripts/functions.py
new file: tags/initial_tags
new file: tags/tags
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2009-04-10 |
713944e |
More neurotic changes
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2008-11-24 |
ce3b3d9 |
More algebra
modified: algebra.tex
|
changed the proof
|
2008-11-24 |
e845320 |
A bit more algebra
modified: algebra.tex
|
changed the proof
|
2008-09-15 |
257ce40 |
modified: algebra.tex
|
created statement with label lemma-NL-homotopy in algebra.tex
|
2008-06-09 |
94eac3a |
modified: algebra.tex
modified: topology.tex
|