Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Example 27.8.13. Let R = \mathbf{C}[t] and

S = R[X_1, X_2, X_3, \ldots ]/(X_ i^2 - tX_{i + 1}).

The grading is such that R = S_0 and \deg (X_ i) = 2^{i - 1}. Note that if \mathfrak p \in \text{Proj}(S) then t \not\in \mathfrak p (otherwise \mathfrak p has to contain all of the X_ i which is not allowed for an element of the homogeneous spectrum). Thus we see that D_{+}(X_ i) = D_{+}(X_{i + 1}) for all i. Hence \text{Proj}(S) is quasi-compact; in fact it is affine since it is equal to D_{+}(X_1). It is easy to see that the image of \text{Proj}(S) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) is D(t). Hence the morphism \text{Proj}(S) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) is not closed. Thus the valuative criterion cannot apply because it would imply that the morphism is closed (see Schemes, Proposition 26.20.6 ).


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 13 comment(s) on Section 27.8: Proj of a graded ring

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.