Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Proof. Let U_ d \to S be the scheme representing the functor F_ d defined above. Let \mathcal{L}_ d, \psi ^ d : \pi _ d^*\mathcal{A}^{(d)} \to \bigoplus _{n \geq 0} \mathcal{L}_ d^{\otimes n} be the universal object. If d | d', then we may consider the quadruple (d', \pi _ d, \mathcal{L}_ d^{\otimes d'/d}, \psi ^ d|_{\mathcal{A}^{(d')}}) which determines a canonical morphism U_ d \to U_{d'} over S. By construction this morphism corresponds to the transformation of functors F_ d \to F_{d'} defined above.

For every affine open \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) = V \subset S setting A = \Gamma (V, \mathcal{A}) we have a canonical identification of the base change U_{d, V} with the corresponding open subscheme of \text{Proj}(A), see Lemma 27.16.2. Moreover, the morphisms U_{d, V} \to U_{d', V} constructed above correspond to the inclusions of opens in \text{Proj}(A). Thus we conclude that U_ d \to U_{d'} is an open immersion.

This allows us to construct X by glueing the schemes U_ d along the open immersions U_ d \to U_{d'}. Technically, it is convenient to choose a sequence d_1 | d_2 | d_3 | \ldots such that every positive integer divides one of the d_ i and to simply take X = \bigcup U_{d_ i} using the open immersions above. It is then a simple matter to prove that X represents the functor F. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.