Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

The Stacks project

History of tag 0318

Go back to the tag's page.

type time link
changed the statement 2016-11-07 e2630ed
completion with respect to a f.g. ideal

Thanks to Bjorn Poonen who writes

"Hi, here is an alternative proof of
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/05GG :
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since $I$ is finitely generated,
$I^n$ is finitely generated, say by $i_1,\ldots,i_r$.
The map $M^r \stackrel{(i_1,\ldots,i_r)}\longrightarrow M$
factors as $M^r \to I^n M \to M$, a surjection followed by an injection.
Taking completions shows that
$(M^\wedge)^r \stackrel{(i_1,\ldots,i_r)}\longrightarrow M^\wedge$
factors as $(M^\wedge)^r \to (I^n M)^\wedge \to M^\wedge$,
again a surjection followed by an injection
by http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0315 part (2)
and http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0BNG , so its image
$I^n M^\wedge$ equals $(I^n M)^\wedge = \ker(M^\wedge \to M/I^n M)$.
Thus $M^\wedge / I^n M^\wedge \simeq M/I^n M$.
Taking inverse limits yields $(M^\wedge)^\wedge \simeq M^\wedge$;
that is, $M^\wedge$ is $I$-adically complete.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you use this, you can also delete
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0318
which is no longer needed.

In fact, if all you want is $M^\wedge / I^n M^\wedge \simeq M/I^n M$
(and hence that $M^\wedge$ is $I$-adically complete),
i.e., if you don't care about computing $(I^n M)^\wedge$,
then you could also prove the needed case of
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0BNG
by hand, and hence delete that lemma too, to obtain the following
proof of
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/05GG :
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since $I$ is finitely generated,
$I^n$ is finitely generated, say by $i_1,\ldots,i_r$.
Applying http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0315 part (2)
to the surjection $M^r \stackrel{(i_1,\ldots,i_r)}\longrightarrow I^nM$
yields a surjection
\[
   (M^\wedge)^r \stackrel{(i_1,\ldots,i_r)}\longrightarrow (I^n M)^\wedge
   = \varprojlim_m I^n M/I^m M = \ker(M^\wedge \to M/I^n M).
\]
On the other hand, the image of
$(M^\wedge)^r \stackrel{(i_1,\ldots,i_r)}\longrightarrow M^\wedge$
is $I^n M^\wedge$. Thus $M^\wedge / I^n M^\wedge \simeq M/I^n M$.
Taking inverse limits yields $(M^\wedge)^\wedge \simeq M^\wedge$;
that is, $M^\wedge$ is $I$-adically complete.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Best,
Bjorn"
changed the statement 2013-12-22 e179438
LaTeX

Introduced a macro

\def\Ker{\text{Ker}}

and replace all occurrences of \text{Ker} with \Ker
changed the proof 2011-08-10 d437c1e
First macro of the project

	This gets rid of all the \nolimits commands following \lim by
	defining

	\def\lim{\mathop{\rm lim}\nolimits}

	in the file preamble.tex. As far as I can tell this is
	equivalent to \lim\nolimits where \lim is the internal command
	of TeX. The dvi files produced before and after this commit are
	identical.
changed the statement and the proof 2010-12-02 65357e3
Fix completion

	The completion of any module with respect of any finitely
	generated ideal is complete! Somehow I knew this (maybe I've
	even used it in papers), but it escaped me while I was writing
	the algebra section on completion. Now it is finally there!
changed the proof 2010-09-25 7c26e38
Cleanup

	Mostly code changes. But also some work is done to remove
	duplicated results and to get the order of lemmas etc correct.

	Still have to move lemma-Mittag-Leffler to the correct spot.
changed the proof 2009-09-29 efc115c
Algebra+Homology: Change to avoid forward references

	modified:   algebra.tex
	modified:   homology.tex
assigned tag 0318 2009-08-21 15d48db
Added new tags

	modified:   tags/tags
changed the statement and the proof 2009-08-17 946301b
More on comlpetion and towards Nagata rings are universally Japanese

	modified:   algebra.tex
created statement with label lemma-hathat in algebra.tex 2009-08-17 54b3586
More stuff in algebra.tex:

	Integral closure is transitive
	Surjectivity of completion of surjective maps?
	Definition of I-adically complete modules
	Criterion as to when completion is complete
	Completion complete in Noetherian case
	Finiteness criterion (still not done)
	Residue field extension of map dvrs bounded
	Complete local ring with finitely generated maximal ideal is
		Noetherian
	Lemmas on Japanese property
	Starting to prove Tate's theorem on Japaneseness of complete
		rings

	modified:   algebra.tex