Processing math: 0%

The Stacks project

Lemma 18.3.1. Let \mathcal{C} be a site. Let \varphi : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G} be a morphism of abelian sheaves on \mathcal{C}.

  1. The category \textit{Ab}(\mathcal{C}) is an abelian category.

  2. The kernel \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\varphi ) of \varphi is the same as the kernel of \varphi as a morphism of presheaves.

  3. The morphism \varphi is injective (Homology, Definition 12.5.3) if and only if \varphi is injective as a map of presheaves (Sites, Definition 7.3.1), if and only if \varphi is injective as a map of sheaves (Sites, Definition 7.11.1).

  4. The cokernel \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(\varphi ) of \varphi is the sheafification of the cokernel of \varphi as a morphism of presheaves.

  5. The morphism \varphi is surjective (Homology, Definition 12.5.3) if and only if \varphi is surjective as a map of sheaves (Sites, Definition 7.11.1).

  6. A complex of abelian sheaves

    \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G} \to \mathcal{H}

    is exact at \mathcal{G} if and only if for all U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}) and all s \in \mathcal{G}(U) mapping to zero in \mathcal{H}(U) there exists a covering \{ U_ i \to U\} _{i \in I} in \mathcal{C} such that each s|_{U_ i} is in the image of \mathcal{F}(U_ i) \to \mathcal{G}(U_ i).

Proof. We claim that Homology, Lemma 12.7.4 applies to the categories \mathcal{A} = \textit{Ab}(\mathcal{C}) and \mathcal{B} = \textit{PAb}(\mathcal{C}), and the functors a : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B} (inclusion), and b : \mathcal{B} \to \mathcal{A} (sheafification). Let us check the assumptions of Homology, Lemma 12.7.4. Assumption (1) is that \mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B} are additive categories, a, b are additive functors, and a is right adjoint to b. The first two statements are clear and adjointness is Sites, Section 7.44 (\epsilon ). Assumption (2) says that \textit{PAb}(\mathcal{C}) is abelian which we saw in Section 18.2 and that sheafification is left exact, which is Sites, Section 7.44 (\zeta ). The final assumption is that ba \cong \text{id}_\mathcal {A} which is Sites, Section 7.44 (\delta ). Hence Homology, Lemma 12.7.4 applies and we conclude that \textit{Ab}(\mathcal{C}) is abelian.

In the proof of Homology, Lemma 12.7.4 it is shown that \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\varphi ) and \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(\varphi ) are equal to the sheafification of the kernel and cokernel of \varphi as a morphism of abelian presheaves. This proves (4). Since the kernel is a equalizer (i.e., a limit) and since sheafification commutes with finite limits, we conclude that (2) holds.

Statement (2) implies (3). Statement (4) implies (5) by our description of sheafification. The characterization of exactness in (6) follows from (2) and (5), and the fact that the sequence is exact if and only if \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}) = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{G} \to \mathcal{H}). \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 18.3: Abelian sheaves

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 03CN. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.