Proof.
It is clear that (2) implies (1). To show that (1) implies (2) we argue by induction on n. The first case is n = 2 (since n = 1 is trivial). In this case we have a_1f_1 + a_2f_2 = 1 for some a_1, a_2 \in \mathcal{O}(U). By assumption we can find a covering \{ U_ j \to U\} such that for each j either a_1f_1|_{U_ j} is invertible or a_2f_2|_{U_ j} is invertible. Hence either f_1|_{U_ j} is invertible or f_2|_{U_ j} is invertible as desired. For n > 2 we have a_1f_1 + \ldots + a_ nf_ n = 1 for some a_1, \ldots , a_ n \in \mathcal{O}(U). By the case n = 2 we see that we have some covering \{ U_ j \to U\} _{j \in J} such that for each j either f_ n|_{U_ j} is invertible or a_1f_1 + \ldots + a_{n - 1}f_{n - 1}|_{U_ j} is invertible. Say the first case happens for j \in J_ n. Set J' = J \setminus J_ n. By induction hypothesis, for each j \in J' we can find a covering \{ U_{jk} \to U_ j\} _{k \in K_ j} such that for each k \in K_ j there exists an i \in \{ 1, \ldots , n - 1\} such that f_ i|_{U_{jk}} is invertible. By the axioms of a site the family of morphisms \{ U_ j \to U\} _{j \in J_ n} \cup \{ U_{jk} \to U\} _{j \in J', k \in K_ j} is a covering which has the desired property.
Assume (1). To see that the map in (3) is surjective, let (f, c) be a section of \mathcal{O} \times \mathcal{O} over U. By assumption there exists a covering \{ U_ j \to U\} such that for each j either f or 1 - f restricts to an invertible section. In the first case we can take a = c|_{U_ j} (f|_{U_ j})^{-1}, and in the second case we can take b = c|_{U_ j} (1 - f|_{U_ j})^{-1}. Hence (f, c) is in the image of the map on each of the members. Conversely, assume (3) holds. For any U and f \in \mathcal{O}(U) there exists a covering \{ U_ j \to U\} of U such that the section (f, 1)|_{U_ j} is in the image of the map in (3) on sections over U_ j. This means precisely that either f or 1 - f restricts to an invertible section over U_ j, and we see that (1) holds.
\square
Comments (0)