Lemma 40.10.10. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $(U, R, s, t, c)$ be a groupoid scheme over $S$. Assume $U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$ with $k$ a field. Assume $s, t$ are locally of finite type. Then $\dim (R) = \dim (G)$ where $G$ is the stabilizer group scheme of $R$.
Proof. Let $Z \subset R$ be the irreducible component passing through $e$ (see Lemma 40.10.8) thought of as an integral closed subscheme of $R$. Let $k'_ s$, resp. $k'_ t$ be the integral closure of $s(k)$, resp. $t(k)$ in $\Gamma (Z, \mathcal{O}_ Z)$. Recall that $k'_ s$ and $k'_ t$ are fields, see Varieties, Lemma 33.28.4. By Varieties, Proposition 33.31.1 we have $k'_ s = k'_ t$ as subrings of $\Gamma (Z, \mathcal{O}_ Z)$. As $e$ factors through $Z$ we obtain a commutative diagram
\[ \xymatrix{ k \ar[rd]_ t \ar[rrd]^1 \\ & \Gamma (Z, \mathcal{O}_ Z) \ar[r]^ e & k \\ k \ar[ru]^ s \ar[rru]_1 } \]
This on the one hand shows that $k'_ s = s(k)$, $k'_ t = t(k)$, so $s(k) = t(k)$, which combined with the diagram above implies that $s = t$! In other words, we conclude that $Z$ is a closed subscheme of $G = R \times _{(t, s), U \times _ S U, \Delta } U$. The lemma follows as both $G$ and $R$ are equidimensional, see Lemma 40.10.9 and Groupoids, Lemma 39.8.1. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)