History of tag 04U1
Go back to the tag's page.
type |
time |
link |
changed the proof
|
2011-08-11 |
4c15ebf |
LaTeX: \Ob
Introduced a macro
\def\Ob{\mathop{\rm Ob}\nolimits}
and replaced any occurence of \text{Ob}( with \Ob(. There are
still some occurences of \text{Ob} but these are sets, not the
operator that takes the set of objects of a category.
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2011-08-11 |
f496b59 |
LaTeX: \Sch
Introduced a new macro
\def\Sch{\textit{Sch}}
and replaced all the occurences of \textit{Sch} with \Sch.
|
changed the proof
|
2010-10-09 |
97a5c76 |
Begin translating etale to \'etale or \acute{e}tale (in Math mode).
|
assigned tag 04U1
|
2010-07-01 |
f27a567
|
Tags: Added new tags
|
created statement with label lemma-descent-torsor in bootstrap.tex
|
2010-07-01 |
f396b03 |
The stack of torsors
There are many different possible definitions for the stack of
torsors for a group algebraic space G over a base B. You can
look at principal homogeneous spaces for the fpqc topology, or,
and this is more natural for us, look at fppf G-torsors. One
reason this is natural is that you get the same thing as looking
at G-torsors where you think of G as a sheaf!
If G is a group scheme over a scheme, then you could also just
look at those fppf G-torsors which are representable. Of course
this is somehow completely the wrong thing to do, but on the
other hand it is what comes natural since we know more about
schemes than about algebraic spaces.
We try to discuss all the possible variants extensively in a
section in the chapter "Examples of Stacks". In the future we
will add some lemmas/propositions/theorems saying that if G has
reasonable properties then these stacks all agree.
|