History of tag 06YX
Go back to the tag's page.
| type |
time |
link |
|
moved the statement to file obsolete.tex
|
2020-12-12 |
53e2e3d |
Move old version pullback K-flat out of the way
to make room for the new and improved version in the next commit
|
|
changed the statement
|
2020-12-12 |
53e2e3d |
Move old version pullback K-flat out of the way
to make room for the new and improved version in the next commit
|
|
changed the statement
|
2017-08-05 |
0f88016 |
Final fallout error fixed in f6e7e84c
This is quite annoying, but the original argument relied on the
erroneous lemma from the commit given above...
Question: Is it actually just true that the pullback of a K-flat complex
along a morphism of ringed topoi is K-flat? Seems to me this is possibly
true but I don't immediately see how to prove it.
Also, it does not seem terribly important.
|
|
changed the statement
|
2017-03-16 |
5e0f348 |
K-flat = stalks K-flat
in the case there are enough points
|
|
changed the statement
|
2011-11-20 |
4c3c010 |
Precise form of K-flat resolutions
Helper lemma for upcoming study of modules on lisse-etale sites.
|
|
assigned tag 06YX
|
2011-08-04 |
19351ae
|
Tags: Added new tags
|
|
created statement with label remark-pullback-K-flat in sites-cohomology.tex
|
2011-08-04 |
babd833 |
Derived pullback for morphisms of topoi
Still using the assumption on the existence of points to see
that pullbacks of flat modules are flat. Does somebody want to
write a section on local inductive limits...?
|