History of tag 07B8
Go back to the tag's page.
| type |
time |
link |
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2022-01-05 |
1f9285c |
Make notation for modules on stacks more uniform
It is possible that these changes make the problem worse!
|
|
changed the proof
|
2018-10-27 |
78adc2c |
Move a section earlier
|
|
changed the proof
|
2017-02-03 |
a4f5598 |
Fix references and tag
|
|
changed the statement
|
2013-12-22 |
1fe214b |
LaTeX
Introduced a macro
\def\QCoh{{\textit{QCoh}}}
and replaced almost all occurences of \textit{QCoh} by \QCoh. There are
still some places where we use \textit{QCoh}, namely in the chapter
on examples of stacks. This is because the meaning there is different;
it indicates a category fibred in groupoids over Sch and not the notational
gadget that takes a ringed topos and spits out its category of
quasi-coherent modules.
|
|
changed the statement
|
2013-08-03 |
badd58f |
Spell check: words starting with b, c, B, or C
|
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2013-05-24 |
719c185 |
LaTeX: \etale
Introduced the macro
\def\etale{{\acute{e}tale}}
and replaced all occurences of \acute{e}tale by \etale
|
|
moved the statement to file stacks-perfect.tex
|
2013-02-22 |
50a9d1d |
Split chapter Cohomology of Stacks; added new chapter
Reason: Same structure as for schemes and spaces
New chapter added to the project
Filename: stacks-perfect.tex
Title: Derived Categories of Stacks
|
|
changed the proof
|
2013-02-22 |
50a9d1d |
Split chapter Cohomology of Stacks; added new chapter
Reason: Same structure as for schemes and spaces
New chapter added to the project
Filename: stacks-perfect.tex
Title: Derived Categories of Stacks
|
|
assigned tag 07B8
|
2011-12-07 |
a9c3de7
|
TAGS: Added new tags
|
|
created statement with label lemma-compare-etale-fppf-QCoh in stacks-cohomology.tex
|
2011-12-06 |
d1792e0 |
Derived categories of quasi-coherent sheaves
This introduces quite a bit of new material on D_{QCoh}(X) for
algebraic stacks X. In particular it writes out completely the
comparison with the definition in Martin Olsson's paper and it
shows how to do derived pushforward.
Finally, we state the approach to derived pullback, but for the
moment the proof is missing.
|