Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

The Stacks project

History of tag 07K7

Go back to the tag's page.

type time link
changed the statement and the proof 2020-06-06 88ff1e3
Stuff about boundedness of Rf_!

Move along, nothing to see here...
changed the proof 2015-06-05 3cc35c6
Use new terminology and fix indices

Try to be more consistent with convergence and all. It turns out to be
basically impossible, because already the statements are not precise
enough. The trouble is that one needs to always assume the spectral
sequence comes from a filtered complex (somewhere somehow) and then one
is using the definition as now given in homology.tex

Thanks to Dingxin Zhang for pointing out wrong signs in shifts
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/015X#comment-1479
changed the proof 2015-02-09 5e8f96f
Add missing hypothesis

The proof of the lemma was wrong and without the assumption it is
likely wrong.

Thanks to JuanPablo who also pointed out other ways to fix it.
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/07K6#comment-1292
changed the proof 2013-10-25 ad3f531
Fixed two typos in proof of Tag 07K5 (lemma-unbounded-right-derived).
assigned tag 07K7 2012-03-21 4e265af
Tags: Added new tags
created statement with label lemma-unbounded-right-derived in derived.tex 2012-03-06 c5a2df5
Bounded coh dim and existence RF

	The easy case where RF exists on the unbounded derived category.
	Somehow we hadn't yet discussed this.