History of tag 09J7
Go back to the tag's page.
| type |
time |
link |
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2019-03-29 |
5b1cf50 |
Fix horrible mistake
Thanks to Jack Hall for noticing this! As pointed out by Jack in fact in
other places we are very careful and we have a finite cohomological
dimension assumption that is needed. ARGH!
Anyway, this is now fixed.
|
|
changed the proof
|
2016-07-21 |
d9db7e1 |
wedge ---> vee
Thanks to the mysterious BB
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/09J6#comment-2116
|
|
changed the statement
|
2013-11-06 |
5689461 |
Two small fixes
|
|
changed the proof
|
2013-10-26 |
098d1da |
Compact objects of D(A, d)
Observe the example showing this is a bit different from the case of the
derived category of a ring.
|
|
assigned tag 09J7
|
2013-08-29 |
5f5bcfb
|
Tags: Added new tags
|
|
created statement with label lemma-perfect-is-compact in cohomology.tex
|
2013-08-26 |
860ebe8 |
Perfect is compact in qc + qs case
Very general. Of course often there are more compact objects
than perfect objects.
|