History of tag 0BJ0
Go back to the tag's page.
| type |
time |
link |
|
changed the proof
|
2022-01-23 |
9cee969 |
Try to use L/K notation for field extensions
We could also try to consistenly use "field extension" and not just
"extension" and consistently use "ring extension", etc.
|
|
changed the proof
|
2017-10-05 |
0adaa52 |
Remove 'f.f.'
Sad IMHO.
Thanks to BCnrd, Dario Weissmann, and sdf
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/02JQ#comment-2762
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/02JQ#comment-2765
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/02JQ#comment-2766
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/02JQ#comment-2767
|
|
changed the proof
|
2015-12-03 |
955c625 |
Small changes; mostly typos
|
|
assigned tag 0BJ0
|
2015-06-28 |
eda091b
|
Tags: Added new tags
|
|
created statement with label lemma-Nagata-local-ring in more-algebra.tex
|
2015-06-28 |
fd2c506 |
Characterize local Nagata rings
Thanks to J\'anos Koll\'ar
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0331#comment-1524
Comment: Clearly this proof is not optimal. On the other hand it is
sometimes a good idea to use a little bit more theory in order for
the reader to see that it exists and the lemma is not just some
completely random fact...
|