111.60 Commutative Algebra, Final Exam, Fall 2017
These were the questions in the final exam of a course on commutative algebra, in the Fall of 2017 at Columbia University.
Exercise 111.60.1 (Definitions). Provide brief definitions of the italicized concepts.
the left adjoint of a functor F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B},
the transcendence degree of an extension L/K of fields,
a regular function on a classical affine variety X \subset k^ n,
a sheaf on a topological space,
a local ring, and
a morphism of schemes f : X \to Y being affine.
Exercise 111.60.2 (Theorems). Precisely but briefly state a nontrivial fact discussed in the lectures related to each item (if there is more than one then just pick one of them).
Yoneda lemma,
Mayer-Vietoris,
dimension and cohomology,
Hilbert polynomial, and
duality for projective space.
Exercise 111.60.3. Let k be an algebraically closed field. Consider the closed subset X of k^5 with Zariski topology and coordinates x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, x_5 given by the equations
x_1^2 - x_4 = 0,\quad x_2^5 - x_5 = 0,\quad x_3^2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 0
What is the dimension of X and why?
Exercise 111.60.4. Let k be a field. Let X = \mathbf{P}^1_ k be the projective space of dimension 1 over k. Let \mathcal{E} be a finite locally free \mathcal{O}_ X-module. For d \in \mathbf{Z} denote \mathcal{E}(d) = \mathcal{E} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{O}_ X(d) the dth Serre twist of \mathcal{E} and h^ i(X, \mathcal{E}(d)) = \dim _ k H^ i(X, \mathcal{E}(d)).
Why is there no \mathcal{E} with h^0(X, \mathcal{E}) = 5 and h^0(X, \mathcal{E}(1)) = 4?
Why is there no \mathcal{E} with h^1(X, \mathcal{E}(1)) = 5 and h^1(X, \mathcal{E}) = 4?
For which a \in \mathbf{Z} can there exist a vector bundle \mathcal{E} on X with
\begin{matrix} h^0(X, \mathcal{E})\phantom{(1)} = 1
& h^1(X, \mathcal{E})\phantom{(1)} = 1
\\ h^0(X, \mathcal{E}(1)) = 2
& h^1(X, \mathcal{E}(1)) = 0
\\ h^0(X, \mathcal{E}(2)) = 4
& h^1(X, \mathcal{E}(2)) = a
\end{matrix}
Partial answers are welcomed and encouraged.
Exercise 111.60.5. Let X be a topological space which is the union X = Y \cup Z of two closed subsets Y and Z whose intersection is denoted W = Y \cap Z. Denote i : Y \to X, j : Z \to X, and k : W \to X the inclusion maps.
Show that there is a short exact sequence of sheaves
0 \to \underline{\mathbf{Z}}_ X \to i_*(\underline{\mathbf{Z}}_ Y) \oplus j_*(\underline{\mathbf{Z}}_ Z) \to k_*(\underline{\mathbf{Z}}_ W) \to 0
where \underline{\mathbf{Z}}_ X denotes the constant sheaf with value \mathbf{Z} on X, etc.
What can you conclude about the relationship between the cohomology groups of X, Y, Z, W with \mathbf{Z}-coefficients?
Exercise 111.60.6. Let k be a field. Let A = k[x_1, x_2, x_3, \ldots ] be the polynomial ring in infinitely many variables. Denote \mathfrak m the maximal ideal of A generated by all the variables. Let X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) and U = X \setminus \{ \mathfrak m\} .
Show H^1(U, \mathcal{O}_ U) = 0. Hint: Čech cohomology computation.
What is your guess for H^ i(U, \mathcal{O}_ U) for i \geq 1?
Exercise 111.60.7. Let A be a local ring. Let a \in A be a nonzerodivisor. Let I, J \subset A be ideals such that IJ = (a). Show that the ideal I is principal, i.e., generated by one element (which will turn out to be a nonzerodivisor).
Comments (0)