Loading web-font TeX/Caligraphic/Regular

The Stacks project

Lemma 8.3.7. Let \mathcal{C} be a category. Let \mathcal{V} = \{ V_ j \to U\} _{j \in J} \to \mathcal{U} = \{ U_ i \to U\} _{i \in I} be a morphism of families of maps with fixed target of \mathcal{C} given by \text{id} : U \to U, \alpha : J \to I and f_ j : V_ j \to U_{\alpha (j)}. Let p : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{C} be a fibred category. If

  1. for 0 \leq p \leq 3 and 0 \leq q \leq 3 with p + q \geq 2 and i_1, \ldots , i_ p \in I and j_1, \ldots , j_ q \in J the fibre products U_{i_1} \times _ U \ldots \times _ U U_{i_ p} \times _ U V_{j_1} \times _ U \ldots \times _ U V_{j_ q} exist,

  2. the functor \mathcal{S}_ U \to DD(\mathcal{V}) is an equivalence,

  3. for every i \in I the functor \mathcal{S}_{U_ i} \to DD(\mathcal{V}_ i) is fully faithful, and

  4. for every i, i' \in I the functor \mathcal{S}_{U_ i \times _ U U_{i'}} \to DD(\mathcal{V}_{ii'}) is faithful.

Here \mathcal{V}_ i = \{ U_ i \times _ U V_ j \to U_ i\} _{j \in J} and \mathcal{V}_{ii'} = \{ U_ i \times _ U U_{i'} \times _ U V_ j \to U_ i \times _ U U_{i'}\} _{j \in J}. Then \mathcal{S}_ U \to DD(\mathcal{U}) is an equivalence.

Proof. Condition (1) guarantees we have enough fibre products so that the statement makes sense. We will show that the functor \mathcal{S}_ U \to DD(\mathcal{U}) is essentially surjective. Suppose given a descent datum (X_ i, \varphi _{ii'}) relative to \mathcal{U}. By Lemma 8.3.3 we can pull this back to a descent datum (X_ j, \varphi _{jj'}) for \mathcal{V}. By assumption (2) this descent datum is effective, hence we get an object X of \mathcal{S}_ U such that the pullback of the trivial descent datum (X, \text{id}_ X) by the morphism \mathcal{V} \to \{ U \to U\} is isomorphic to (X_ j, \varphi _{jj'}). Next, observe that we have a diagram

\xymatrix{ \mathcal{V}_ i \ar[r] \ar[d] & \mathcal{V} \ar[r] & \mathcal{U} \ar[d] \\ \{ U_ i \to U_ i\} \ar[rr] \ar[rru] & & \{ U \to U\} }

of morphisms of families of maps with fixed target of \mathcal{C}. This diagram does not commute, but by Lemma 8.3.3 the pullback functors on descent data one gets are canonically isomorphic. Hence (X, \text{id}_ X) and (X_ i, \text{id}_{X_ i}) pull back to isomorphic objects in DD(\mathcal{V}_ i). Hence by assumption (3) we obtain an isomorphism (U_ i \to U)^*X \to X_ i in the category \mathcal{S}_{U_ i}. We omit the verification that these arrows are compatible with the morphisms \varphi _{ii'}; hint: use the faithfulness of the functors in condition (4). We also omit the verification that the functor \mathcal{S}_ U \to DD(\mathcal{U}) is fully faithful. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 4 comment(s) on Section 8.3: Descent data in fibred categories

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.