Loading web-font TeX/Caligraphic/Regular

The Stacks project

Lemma 3.12.1. Suppose given a big category \mathcal{A} (see Categories, Remark 4.2.2). Assume \mathcal{A} is abelian and has enough injectives. See Homology, Definitions 12.5.1 and 12.27.4. Then for any given set of objects \{ A_ s\} _{s\in S} of \mathcal{A}, there is an abelian subcategory \mathcal{A}' \subset \mathcal{A} with the following properties:

  1. the inclusion functor \mathcal{A}' \to \mathcal{A} is exact,

  2. \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A}') is a set,

  3. \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A}') contains A_ s for each s \in S,

  4. \mathcal{A}' has enough injectives, and

  5. an object of \mathcal{A}' is injective if and only if it is an injective object of \mathcal{A}.

Proof. Omitted. \square


Comments (4)

Comment #7968 by Haohao Liu on

A tiny suggestion: it may be better to define "abelian subcategory".

Comment #8681 by Haohao Liu on

To Comment #8193: Then for a topological space , the category of abelian sheaves on is an abelian subcategory of the category of abelian presheaves on in the comment's sense. In general, the inclusion functor is not exact, so is not an abelian subcategory of in the sense of p.7 of "Introduction to Homological Algebra" by Weibel.

Comment #9386 by on

OK, thanks for the comment on this. I have added the condition that we want to be exact in the statement of the lemma. See here.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.