Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 5.12.10. Let X be a topological space. Assume

  1. X is quasi-compact,

  2. X has a basis for the topology consisting of quasi-compact opens, and

  3. the intersection of two quasi-compact opens is quasi-compact.

For any x \in X the connected component of X containing x is the intersection of all open and closed subsets of X containing x.

Proof. Let T be the connected component containing x. Let S = \bigcap _{\alpha \in A} Z_\alpha be the intersection of all open and closed subsets Z_\alpha of X containing x. Note that S is closed in X. Note that any finite intersection of Z_\alpha 's is a Z_\alpha . Because T is connected and x \in T we have T \subset S. It suffices to show that S is connected. If not, then there exists a disjoint union decomposition S = B \amalg C with B and C open and closed in S. In particular, B and C are closed in X, and so quasi-compact by Lemma 5.12.3 and assumption (1). By assumption (2) there exist quasi-compact opens U, V \subset X with B = S \cap U and C = S \cap V (details omitted). Then U \cap V \cap S = \emptyset . Hence \bigcap _\alpha U \cap V \cap Z_\alpha = \emptyset . By assumption (3) the intersection U \cap V is quasi-compact. By Lemma 5.12.6 for some \alpha ' \in A we have U \cap V \cap Z_{\alpha '} = \emptyset . Since X \setminus (U \cup V) is disjoint from S and closed in X hence quasi-compact, we can use the same lemma to see that Z_{\alpha ''} \subset U \cup V for some \alpha '' \in A. Then Z_\alpha = Z_{\alpha '} \cap Z_{\alpha ''} is contained in U \cup V and disjoint from U \cap V. Hence Z_\alpha = U \cap Z_\alpha \amalg V \cap Z_\alpha is a decomposition into two open pieces, hence U \cap Z_\alpha and V \cap Z_\alpha are open and closed in X. Thus, if x \in B say, then we see that S \subset U \cap Z_\alpha and we conclude that C = \emptyset . \square


Comments (2)

Comment #636 by Wei Xu on

Dear stacks project,

There is a possible small gap between "for some we have ." and "Hence ". Possibly we might need to add words like "(with some argurements) we may aslo assume this " before the sentense "Hence ..."

Comment #644 by on

Yes, I agree one needs an argument there. I added something here. Thanks!

There are also:

  • 3 comment(s) on Section 5.12: Quasi-compact spaces and maps

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.