Lemma 10.24.1. Let R be a ring. Let f_1, \ldots , f_ n be elements of R generating the unit ideal. Let M be an R-module. The sequence
0 \to M \xrightarrow {\alpha } \bigoplus \nolimits _{i = 1}^ n M_{f_ i} \xrightarrow {\beta } \bigoplus \nolimits _{i, j = 1}^ n M_{f_ i f_ j}
is exact, where \alpha (m) = (m/1, \ldots , m/1) and \beta (m_1/f_1^{e_1}, \ldots , m_ n/f_ n^{e_ n}) = (m_ i/f_ i^{e_ i} - m_ j/f_ j^{e_ j})_{(i, j)}.
Proof.
It suffices to show that the localization of the sequence at any maximal ideal \mathfrak m is exact, see Lemma 10.23.1. Since f_1, \ldots , f_ n generate the unit ideal, there is an i such that f_ i \not\in \mathfrak m. After renumbering we may assume i = 1. Note that (M_{f_ i})_\mathfrak m = (M_\mathfrak m)_{f_ i} and (M_{f_ if_ j})_\mathfrak m = (M_\mathfrak m)_{f_ if_ j}, see Proposition 10.9.11. In particular (M_{f_1})_\mathfrak m = M_\mathfrak m and (M_{f_1 f_ i})_\mathfrak m = (M_\mathfrak m)_{f_ i}, because f_1 is a unit. Note that the maps in the sequence are the canonical ones coming from Lemma 10.9.7 and the identity map on M. Having said all of this, after replacing R by R_\mathfrak m, M by M_\mathfrak m, and f_ i by their image in R_\mathfrak m, and f_1 by 1 \in R_\mathfrak m, we reduce to the case where f_1 = 1.
Assume f_1 = 1. Injectivity of \alpha is now trivial. Let m = (m_ i) \in \bigoplus _{i = 1}^ n M_{f_ i} be in the kernel of \beta . Then m_1 \in M_{f_1} = M. Moreover, \beta (m) = 0 implies that m_1 and m_ i map to the same element of M_{f_1f_ i} = M_{f_ i}. Thus \alpha (m_1) = m and the proof is complete.
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: