The Stacks project

10.56 Graded rings

A graded ring will be for us a ring $S$ endowed with a direct sum decomposition $S = \bigoplus _{d \geq 0} S_ d$ of the underlying abelian group such that $S_ d \cdot S_ e \subset S_{d + e}$. Note that we do not allow nonzero elements in negative degrees. The irrelevant ideal is the ideal $S_{+} = \bigoplus _{d > 0} S_ d$. A graded module will be an $S$-module $M$ endowed with a direct sum decomposition $M = \bigoplus _{n\in \mathbf{Z}} M_ n$ of the underlying abelian group such that $S_ d \cdot M_ e \subset M_{d + e}$. Note that for modules we do allow nonzero elements in negative degrees. We think of $S$ as a graded $S$-module by setting $S_{-k} = (0)$ for $k > 0$. An element $x$ (resp. $f$) of $M$ (resp. $S$) is called homogeneous if $x \in M_ d$ (resp. $f \in S_ d$) for some $d$. A map of graded $S$-modules is a map of $S$-modules $\varphi : M \to M'$ such that $\varphi (M_ d) \subset M'_ d$. We do not allow maps to shift degrees. Let us denote $\text{GrHom}_0(M, N)$ the $S_0$-module of homomorphisms of graded modules from $M$ to $N$.

At this point there are the notions of graded ideal, graded quotient ring, graded submodule, graded quotient module, graded tensor product, etc. We leave it to the reader to find the relevant definitions, and lemmas. For example: A short exact sequence of graded modules is short exact in every degree.

Given a graded ring $S$, a graded $S$-module $M$ and $n \in \mathbf{Z}$ we denote $M(n)$ the graded $S$-module with $M(n)_ d = M_{n + d}$. This is called the twist of $M$ by $n$. In particular we get modules $S(n)$, $n \in \mathbf{Z}$ which will play an important role in the study of projective schemes. There are some obvious functorial isomorphisms such as $(M \oplus N)(n) = M(n) \oplus N(n)$, $(M \otimes _ S N)(n) = M \otimes _ S N(n) = M(n) \otimes _ S N$. In addition we can define a graded $S$-module structure on the $S_0$-module

\[ \text{GrHom}(M, N) = \bigoplus \nolimits _{n \in \mathbf{Z}} \text{GrHom}_ n(M, N), \quad \text{GrHom}_ n(M, N) = \text{GrHom}_0(M, N(n)). \]

We omit the definition of the multiplication.

Lemma 10.56.1. Let $S$ be a graded ring. Let $M$ be a graded $S$-module.

  1. If $S_+M = M$ and $M$ is finite, then $M = 0$.

  2. If $N, N' \subset M$ are graded submodules, $M = N + S_+N'$, and $N'$ is finite, then $M = N$.

  3. If $N \to M$ is a map of graded modules, $N/S_+N \to M/S_+M$ is surjective, and $M$ is finite, then $N \to M$ is surjective.

  4. If $x_1, \ldots , x_ n \in M$ are homogeneous and generate $M/S_+M$ and $M$ is finite, then $x_1, \ldots , x_ n$ generate $M$.

Proof. Proof of (1). Choose generators $y_1, \ldots , y_ r$ of $M$ over $S$. We may assume that $y_ i$ is homogeneous of degree $d_ i$. After renumbering we may assume $d_ r = \min (d_ i)$. Then the condition that $S_+M = M$ implies $y_ r = 0$. Hence $M = 0$ by induction on $r$. Part (2) follows by applying (1) to $M/N$. Part (3) follows by applying (2) to the submodules $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(N \to M)$ and $M$. Part (4) follows by applying (3) to the module map $\bigoplus S(-d_ i) \to M$, $(s_1, \ldots , s_ n) \mapsto \sum s_ i x_ i$. $\square$

Let $S$ be a graded ring. Let $d \geq 1$ be an integer. We set $S^{(d)} = \bigoplus _{n \geq 0} S_{nd}$. We think of $S^{(d)}$ as a graded ring with degree $n$ summand $(S^{(d)})_ n = S_{nd}$. Given a graded $S$-module $M$ we can similarly consider $M^{(d)} = \bigoplus _{n \in \mathbf{Z}} M_{nd}$ which is a graded $S^{(d)}$-module.

Lemma 10.56.2. Let $S$ be a graded ring, which is finitely generated over $S_0$. Then for all sufficiently divisible $d$ the algebra $S^{(d)}$ is generated in degree $1$ over $S_0$.

Proof. Say $S$ is generated by $f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in S$ over $S_0$. After replacing $f_ i$ by their homogeneous parts, we may assume $f_ i$ is homogeneous of degree $d_ i > 0$. Then any element of $S_ n$ is a linear combination with coefficients in $S_0$ of monomials $f_1^{e_1} \ldots f_ r^{e_ r}$ with $\sum e_ i d_ i = n$. Let $m$ be a multiple of $\text{lcm}(d_ i)$. For any $N \geq r$ if

\[ \sum e_ i d_ i = N m \]

then for some $i$ we have $e_ i \geq m/d_ i$ by an elementary argument. Hence every monomial of degree $N m$ is a product of a monomial of degree $m$, namely $f_ i^{m/d_ i}$, and a monomial of degree $(N - 1)m$. It follows that any monomial of degree $nrm$ with $n \geq 2$ is a product of monomials of degree $rm$. Thus $S^{(rm)}$ is generated in degree $1$ over $S_0$. $\square$

Lemma 10.56.3. Let $R \to S$ be a homomorphism of graded rings. Let $S' \subset S$ be the integral closure of $R$ in $S$. Then

\[ S' = \bigoplus \nolimits _{d \geq 0} S' \cap S_ d, \]

i.e., $S'$ is a graded $R$-subalgebra of $S$.

Proof. We have to show the following: If $s = s_ n + s_{n + 1} + \ldots + s_ m \in S'$, then each homogeneous part $s_ j \in S'$. We will prove this by induction on $m - n$ over all homomorphisms $R \to S$ of graded rings. First note that it is immediate that $s_0$ is integral over $R_0$ (hence over $R$) as there is a ring map $S \to S_0$ compatible with the ring map $R \to R_0$. Thus, after replacing $s$ by $s - s_0$, we may assume $n > 0$. Consider the extension of graded rings $R[t, t^{-1}] \to S[t, t^{-1}]$ where $t$ has degree $0$. There is a commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ S[t, t^{-1}] \ar[rr]_{s \mapsto t^{\deg (s)}s} & & S[t, t^{-1}] \\ R[t, t^{-1}] \ar[u] \ar[rr]^{r \mapsto t^{\deg (r)}r} & & R[t, t^{-1}] \ar[u] } \]

where the horizontal maps are ring automorphisms. Hence the integral closure $C$ of $S[t, t^{-1}]$ over $R[t, t^{-1}]$ maps into itself. Thus we see that

\[ t^ m(s_ n + s_{n + 1} + \ldots + s_ m) - (t^ ns_ n + t^{n + 1}s_{n + 1} + \ldots + t^ ms_ m) \in C \]

which implies by induction hypothesis that each $(t^ m - t^ i)s_ i \in C$ for $i = n, \ldots , m - 1$. Note that for any ring $A$ and $m > i \geq n > 0$ we have $A[t, t^{-1}]/(t^ m - t^ i - 1) \cong A[t]/(t^ m - t^ i - 1) \supset A$ because $t(t^{m - 1} - t^{i - 1}) = 1$ in $A[t]/(t^ m - t^ i - 1)$. Since $t^ m - t^ i$ maps to $1$ we see the image of $s_ i$ in the ring $S[t]/(t^ m - t^ i - 1)$ is integral over $R[t]/(t^ m - t^ i - 1)$ for $i = n, \ldots , m - 1$. Since $R \to R[t]/(t^ m - t^ i - 1)$ is finite we see that $s_ i$ is integral over $R$ by transitivity, see Lemma 10.36.6. Finally, we also conclude that $s_ m = s - \sum _{i = n, \ldots , m - 1} s_ i$ is integral over $R$. $\square$

Comments (3)

Comment #675 by Keenan Kidwell on

In the proof of 077G, the bottom horizontal map in the diagram should be , right?

Comment #6518 by Zhenhua Wu on

In the first line, "ring endowed with a direct sum decomposition ", I was always wondering about which kind of structure are those and which kind of direct sum is this? So I suggest it changes to "ring endowed with a direct sum decomposition of abelian groups ".

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 00JL. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.