Remark 7.13.6. (Skip on first reading.) Let $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$ be sites. Let us use the definition of tautologically equivalent families of maps, see Definition 7.8.2 to (slightly) weaken the conditions defining continuity. Let $u : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}$ be a functor. Let us call $u$ *quasi-continuous* if for every $\mathcal{V} = \{ V_ i \to V\} _{i\in I} \in \text{Cov}(\mathcal{C})$ we have the following

the family of maps $\{ u(V_ i) \to u(V)\} _{i\in I}$ is tautologically equivalent to an element of $\text{Cov}(\mathcal{D})$, and

for any morphism $T \to V$ in $\mathcal{C}$ the morphism $u(T \times _ V V_ i) \to u(T) \times _{u(V)} u(V_ i)$ is an isomorphism.

We are going to see that Lemmas 7.13.2 and 7.13.3 hold in case $u$ is quasi-continuous as well.

We first remark that the morphisms $u(V_ i) \to u(V)$ are representable, since they are isomorphic to representable morphisms (by the first condition). In particular, the family $u(\mathcal{V}) = \{ u(V_ i) \to u(V)\} _{i\in I}$ gives rise to a zeroth Čech cohomology group $H^0(u(\mathcal{V}), \mathcal{F})$ for any presheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $\mathcal{D}$. Let $\mathcal{U} = \{ U_ j \to u(V)\} _{j \in J}$ be an element of $\text{Cov}(\mathcal{D})$ tautologically equivalent to $\{ u(V_ i) \to u(V)\} _{i \in I}$. Note that $u(\mathcal{V})$ is a refinement of $\mathcal{U}$ and vice versa. Hence by Remark 7.10.7 we see that $H^0(u(\mathcal{V}), \mathcal{F}) = H^0(\mathcal{U}, \mathcal{F})$. In particular, if $\mathcal{F}$ is a sheaf, then $\mathcal{F}(u(V)) = H^0(u(\mathcal{V}), \mathcal{F})$ because of the sheaf property expressed in terms of zeroth Čech cohomology groups. We conclude that $u^ p\mathcal{F}$ is a sheaf if $\mathcal{F}$ is a sheaf, since $H^0(\mathcal{V}, u^ p\mathcal{F}) = H^0(u(\mathcal{V}), \mathcal{F})$ which we just observed is equal to $\mathcal{F}(u(V)) = u^ p\mathcal{F}(V)$. Thus Lemma 7.13.2 holds. Lemma 7.13.3 follows immediately.

## Comments (0)

There are also: