Proof.
Part (3) is trivial from the definition of L and the definition of a sheaf (Definition 7.47.10). Part (4) follows formally from the others.
We sketch the proof of (1). Suppose S is a covering sieve of the object U. Suppose that \varphi _ i \in L\mathcal{F}(U), i = 1, 2 map to the same element in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{C})}(S, L\mathcal{F}). We may find a single covering sieve S' on U such that both \varphi _ i are represented by elements \varphi _ i \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{C})}(S', \mathcal{F}). We may assume that S' = S by replacing both S and S' by S' \cap S which is also a covering sieve, see Lemma 7.47.2. Suppose V\in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}), and \alpha : V \to U in S(V). Then we have S \times _ U V = h_ V, see Lemma 7.47.5. Thus the restrictions of \varphi _ i via V \to U correspond to sections s_{i, V, \alpha } of \mathcal{F} over V. The assumption is that there exist a covering sieve S_{V, \alpha } of V such that s_{i, V, \alpha } restrict to the same element of \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{C})}(S_{V, \alpha }, \mathcal{F}). Consider the sieve S'' on U defined by the rule
7.49.3.1
\begin{eqnarray} \label{sites-equation-S-prime-prime} (f : T \to U) \in S''(T) & \Leftrightarrow & \exists \ V , \ \alpha : V \to U, \ \alpha \in S(V), \nonumber \\ & & \exists \ g : T \to V, \ g \in S_{V, \alpha }(T), \\ & & f = \alpha \circ g \nonumber \end{eqnarray}
By axiom (2) of a topology we see that S'' is a covering sieve on U. By construction we see that \varphi _1 and \varphi _2 restrict to the same element of \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\textit{PSh}(\mathcal{C})}(S'', L\mathcal{F}) as desired.
We sketch the proof of (2). Assume that \mathcal{F} is a separated presheaf of sets on \mathcal{C} with respect to the topology J. Let S be a covering sieve of the object U of \mathcal{C}. Suppose that \varphi \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(S, L\mathcal{F}). We have to find an element s \in L\mathcal{F}(U) restricting to \varphi . Suppose V\in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}), and \alpha : V \to U in S(V). The value \varphi (\alpha ) \in L\mathcal{F}(V) is given by a covering sieve S_{V, \alpha } of V and a morphism of presheaves \varphi _{V, \alpha } : S_{V, \alpha } \to \mathcal{F}. As in the proof above, define a covering sieve S'' on U by Equation (7.49.3.1). We define
\varphi '' : S'' \longrightarrow \mathcal{F}
by the following simple rule: For every f : T \to U, f \in S''(T) choose V, \alpha , g as in Equation (7.49.3.1). Then set
\varphi ''(f) = \varphi _{V, \alpha }(g).
We claim this is independent of the choice of V, \alpha , g. Consider a second such choice V', \alpha ', g'. The restrictions of \varphi _{V, \alpha } and \varphi _{V', \alpha '} to the intersection of the following covering sieves on T
(S_{V, \alpha } \times _{V, g} T) \cap (S_{V', \alpha '} \times _{V', g'} T)
agree. Namely, these restrictions both correspond to the restriction of \varphi to T (via f) and the desired equality follows because \mathcal{F} is separated. Denote the common restriction \psi . The independence of choice follows because \varphi _{V, \alpha }(g) = \psi (\text{id}_ T) = \varphi _{V', \alpha '}(g'). OK, so now \varphi '' gives an element s \in L\mathcal{F}(U). We leave it to the reader to check that s restricts to \varphi .
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: