History of tag 010J
Go back to the tag's page.
type |
time |
link |
changed the statement
|
2023-01-16 |
859f6f0 |
Two typos in homology
THanks to jose and LSpice
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/010I#comment-7757
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/010I#comment-7953
|
changed the statement
|
2017-07-06 |
ef31dda |
Small changes to homology
|
changed the statement
|
2017-07-03 |
9f0e536 |
homology.tex: latex normalizations
|
changed the statement
|
2017-06-05 |
6bb24dd |
homology.tex: define morphisms of extensions
Not sure if there is an abstract-nonsense reason why
it is the only reasonable definition; I don't see one,
so I added an explicit definition.
|
changed the statement
|
2017-02-17 |
892db41 |
C should be B
Thanks to Fred Rohrer
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/010J#comment-2376
|
changed the statement
|
2011-08-11 |
4c15ebf |
LaTeX: \Ob
Introduced a macro
\def\Ob{\mathop{\rm Ob}\nolimits}
and replaced any occurence of \text{Ob}( with \Ob(. There are
still some occurences of \text{Ob} but these are sets, not the
operator that takes the set of objects of a category.
|
assigned tag 010J
|
2009-05-16 |
fad2e12
|
Started tags infrastructure
new file: scripts/add_tags.py
modified: scripts/functions.py
new file: tags/initial_tags
new file: tags/tags
|
created statement with label definition-extension in homology.tex
|
2008-11-04 |
3e999da |
More changes to simplicial and homology
|