The Stacks project

Lemma 13.16.5. Let $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ be a left exact functor between abelian categories and assume $RF : D^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to D^{+}(\mathcal{B})$ is everywhere defined. Let $0 \to A \to B \to C \to 0$ be a short exact sequence of $\mathcal{A}$.

  1. If $A$ and $C$ are right acyclic for $F$ then so is $B$.

  2. If $A$ and $B$ are right acyclic for $F$ then so is $C$.

  3. If $B$ and $C$ are right acyclic for $F$ and $F(B) \to F(C)$ is surjective then $A$ is right acyclic for $F$.

In each of the three cases

\[ 0 \to F(A) \to F(B) \to F(C) \to 0 \]

is a short exact sequence of $\mathcal{B}$.

Proof. By Lemma 13.12.1 we obtain a distinguished triangle $(A[0], B[0], C[0], a, b, c)$ in $D^{+}(\mathcal{A})$. As $RF$ is an exact functor and since $R^ iF = 0$ for $i < 0$ and $R^0F = F$ (Lemma 13.16.3) we obtain an exact cohomology sequence

\[ 0 \to F(A) \to F(B) \to F(C) \to R^1F(A) \to \ldots \]

in the abelian category $\mathcal{B}$. Thus the lemma follows from the characterization of acyclic objects in Lemma 13.16.4. $\square$

Comments (2)

Comment #8401 by on

In the first sentence, I believe it should be , not .

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 015D. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.