Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Remark 14.5.3. By abuse of notation we sometimes write \delta _ i : U_{n - 1} \to U_ n instead of \delta ^ n_ i, and similarly for \sigma _ i : U_{n + 1} \to U_ n. The relations among the morphisms \delta ^ n_ i and \sigma ^ n_ i may be expressed as follows:

  1. If i < j, then \delta _ j \circ \delta _ i = \delta _ i \circ \delta _{j - 1}.

  2. If i < j, then \sigma _ j \circ \delta _ i = \delta _ i \circ \sigma _{j - 1}.

  3. We have \text{id} = \sigma _ j \circ \delta _ j = \sigma _ j \circ \delta _{j + 1}.

  4. If i > j + 1, then \sigma _ j \circ \delta _ i = \delta _{i - 1} \circ \sigma _ j.

  5. If i \leq j, then \sigma _ j \circ \sigma _ i = \sigma _ i \circ \sigma _{j + 1}.

This means that whenever the compositions on both the left and the right are defined then the corresponding equality should hold.


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 14.5: Cosimplicial objects

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.