Lemma 14.18.9. Let \mathcal{A} be an abelian category. Let U be a simplicial object of \mathcal{A}. Let n \geq 0 be an integer. The rule
U'_ m = \sum \nolimits _{\varphi : [m] \to [i], \ i\leq n} \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(U(\varphi ))
defines a sub simplicial object U' \subset U with U'_ i = U_ i for i \leq n. Moreover, N(U'_ m) = 0 for all m > n.
Proof.
Pick m, i \leq n and some \varphi : [m] \to [i]. The image under U(\psi ) of \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(U(\varphi )) for any \psi : [m'] \to [m] is equal to the image of U(\varphi \circ \psi ) and \varphi \circ \psi : [m'] \to [i]. Hence U' is a simplicial object. Pick m > n. We have to show N(U'_ m) = 0. By definition of N(U_ m) and N(U'_ m) we have N(U'_ m) = U'_ m \cap N(U_ m) (intersection of subobjects). Since U is split by Lemma 14.18.6, it suffices to show that U'_ m is contained in the sum
\sum \nolimits _{\varphi : [m] \to [m']\text{ surjective}, \ m' < m} \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(U(\varphi )|_{N(U_{m'})}).
By the splitting each U_{m'} is the sum of images of N(U_{m''}) via U(\psi ) for surjective maps \psi : [m'] \to [m'']. Hence the displayed sum above is the same as
\sum \nolimits _{\varphi : [m] \to [m']\text{ surjective}, \ m' < m} \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(U(\varphi )).
Clearly U'_ m is contained in this by the simple fact that any \varphi : [m] \to [i], i \leq n occurring in the definition of U'_ m may be factored as [m] \to [m'] \to [i] with [m] \to [m'] surjective and m' < m as in the last displayed sum above.
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: