Lemma 14.19.5. Let n be an integer \geq 1. Let U be a n-truncated simplicial object of \mathcal{C}. Consider the contravariant functor from \mathcal{C} to \textit{Sets} which associates to an object T the set
\{ (f_0, \ldots , f_{n + 1}) \in \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(T, U_ n) \mid d^ n_{j - 1} \circ f_ i = d^ n_ i \circ f_ j \ \forall \ 0\leq i < j\leq n + 1\}
If this functor is representable by some object U_{n + 1} of \mathcal{C}, then
U_{n + 1} = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{(\Delta /[n + 1])_{\leq n}^{opp}} U(n)
Proof.
The limit, if it exists, represents the functor that associates to an object T the set
\{ (f_\alpha )_{\alpha : [k] \to [n + 1], k \leq n} \mid f_{\alpha \circ \psi } = U(\psi ) \circ f_\alpha \ \forall \ \psi : [k'] \to [k], \alpha : [k] \to [n + 1] \} .
In fact we will show this functor is isomorphic to the one displayed in the lemma. The map in one direction is given by the rule
(f_\alpha )_{\alpha } \longmapsto (f_{\delta ^{n + 1}_0}, \ldots , f_{\delta ^{n + 1}_{n + 1}}).
This satisfies the conditions of the lemma because
d^ n_{j - 1} \circ f_{\delta ^{n + 1}_ i} = f_{\delta ^{n + 1}_ i \circ \delta ^ n_{j - 1}} = f_{\delta ^{n + 1}_ j \circ \delta ^ n_ i} = d^ n_ i \circ f_{\delta ^{n + 1}_ j}
by the relations we recalled above the lemma. To construct a map in the other direction we have to associate to a system (f_0, \ldots , f_{n + 1}) as in the displayed formula of the lemma a system of maps f_\alpha . Let \alpha : [k] \to [n + 1] be given. Since k \leq n the map \alpha is not surjective. Hence we can write \alpha = \delta ^{n + 1}_ i \circ \psi for some 0 \leq i \leq n + 1 and some \psi : [k] \to [n]. We have no choice but to define
f_\alpha = U(\psi ) \circ f_ i.
Of course we have to check that this is independent of the choice of the pair (i, \psi ). First, observe that given i there is a unique \psi which works. Second, suppose that (j, \phi ) is another pair. Then i \not= j and we may assume i < j. Since both i, j are not in the image of \alpha we may actually write \alpha = \delta ^{n + 1}_{i, j} \circ \xi and then we see that \psi = \delta ^ n_{j - 1} \circ \xi and \phi = \delta ^ n_ i \circ \xi . Thus
\begin{eqnarray*} U(\psi ) \circ f_ i & = & U(\delta ^ n_{j - 1} \circ \xi ) \circ f_ i \\ & = & U(\xi ) \circ d^ n_{j - 1} \circ f_ i \\ & = & U(\xi ) \circ d^ n_ i \circ f_ j \\ & = & U(\delta ^ n_ i \circ \xi ) \circ f_ j \\ & = & U(\phi ) \circ f_ j \end{eqnarray*}
as desired. We still have to verify that the maps f_\alpha so defined satisfy the rules of a system of maps (f_\alpha )_\alpha . To see this suppose that \psi : [k'] \to [k], \alpha : [k] \to [n + 1] with k, k' \leq n. Set \alpha ' = \alpha \circ \psi . Choose i not in the image of \alpha . Then clearly i is not in the image of \alpha ' also. Write \alpha = \delta ^{n + 1}_ i \circ \phi (we cannot use the letter \psi here because we've already used it). Then obviously \alpha ' = \delta ^{n + 1}_ i \circ \phi \circ \psi . By construction above we then have
U(\psi ) \circ f_\alpha = U(\psi ) \circ U(\phi ) \circ f_ i = U(\phi \circ \psi ) \circ f_ i = f_{\alpha \circ \psi } = f_{\alpha '}
as desired. We leave to the reader the pleasant task of verifying that our constructions are mutually inverse bijections, and are functorial in T.
\square
Comments (4)
Comment #1022 by correction_bot on
Comment #1030 by Johan on
Comment #1032 by correction_bot on
Comment #1033 by Johan on
There are also: