The Stacks project

27.17 Quasi-coherent sheaves on relative Proj

We briefly discuss how to deal with graded modules in the relative setting.

We place ourselves in Situation 27.15.1. So $S$ is a scheme, and $\mathcal{A}$ is a quasi-coherent graded $\mathcal{O}_ S$-algebra. Let $\mathcal{M} = \bigoplus _{n \in \mathbf{Z}} \mathcal{M}_ n$ be a graded $\mathcal{A}$-module, quasi-coherent as an $\mathcal{O}_ S$-module. We are going to describe the associated quasi-coherent sheaf of modules on $\underline{\text{Proj}}_ S(\mathcal{A})$. We first describe the value of this sheaf on schemes $T$ mapping into the relative Proj.

Let $T$ be a scheme. Let $(d, f : T \to S, \mathcal{L}, \psi )$ be a quadruple over $T$, as in Section 27.16. We define a quasi-coherent sheaf $\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_ T$ of $\mathcal{O}_ T$-modules as follows
\begin{equation} \label{constructions-equation-widetilde-M} \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_ T = \left( f^*\mathcal{M}^{(d)} \otimes _{f^*\mathcal{A}^{(d)}} \left(\bigoplus \nolimits _{n \in \mathbf{Z}} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}\right) \right)_0 \end{equation}

So $\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_ T$ is the degree $0$ part of the tensor product of the graded $f^*\mathcal{A}^{(d)}$-modules $\mathcal{M}^{(d)}$ and $\bigoplus \nolimits _{n \in \mathbf{Z}} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}$. Note that the sheaf $\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_ T$ depends on the quadruple even though we suppressed this in the notation. This construction has the pleasing property that given any morphism $g : T' \to T$ we have $\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_{T'} = g^*\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_ T$ where $\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_{T'}$ denotes the quasi-coherent sheaf associated to the pullback quadruple $(d, f \circ g, g^*\mathcal{L}, g^*\psi )$.

Since all sheaves in ( are quasi-coherent we can spell out the construction over an affine open $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C) = V \subset T$ which maps into an affine open $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) = U \subset S$. Namely, suppose that $\mathcal{A}|_ U$ corresponds to the graded $R$-algebra $A$, that $\mathcal{M}|_ U$ corresponds to the graded $A$-module $M$, and that $\mathcal{L}|_ V$ corresponds to the invertible $C$-module $L$. The map $\psi $ gives rise to a graded $R$-algebra map $\gamma : A^{(d)} \to \bigoplus _{n \geq 0} L^{\otimes n}$. (Tensor powers of $L$ over $C$.) Then $(\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_ T)|_ V$ is the quasi-coherent sheaf associated to the $C$-module

\[ N_{R, C, A, M, \gamma } = \left( M^{(d)} \otimes _{A^{(d)}, \gamma } \left(\bigoplus \nolimits _{n \in \mathbf{Z}} L^{\otimes n}\right) \right)_0 \]

By assumption we may even cover $T$ by affine opens $V$ such that there exists some $a \in A_ d$ such that $\gamma (a) \in L$ is a $C$-basis for the module $L$. In that case any element of $N_{R, C, A, M, \gamma }$ is a sum of pure tensors $\sum m_ i \otimes \gamma (a)^{-n_ i}$ with $m \in M_{n_ id}$. In fact we may multiply each $m_ i$ with a suitable positive power of $a$ and collect terms to see that each element of $N_{R, C, A, M, \gamma }$ can be written as $m \otimes \gamma (a)^{-n}$ with $m \in M_{nd}$ and $n \gg 0$. In other words we see that in this case

\[ N_{R, C, A, M, \gamma } = M_{(a)} \otimes _{A_{(a)}} C \]

where the map $A_{(a)} \to C$ is the map $x/a^ n \mapsto \gamma (x)/\gamma (a)^ n$. In other words, this is the value of $\widetilde{M}$ on $D_{+}(a) \subset \text{Proj}(A)$ pulled back to $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C)$ via the morphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(C) \to D_{+}(a)$ coming from $\gamma $.

Lemma 27.17.1. In Situation 27.15.1. For any quasi-coherent sheaf of graded $\mathcal{A}$-modules $\mathcal{M}$ on $S$, there exists a canonical associated sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_{\underline{\text{Proj}}_ S(\mathcal{A})}$-modules $\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}$ with the following properties:

  1. Given a scheme $T$ and a quadruple $(T \to S, d, \mathcal{L}, \psi )$ over $T$ corresponding to a morphism $h : T \to \underline{\text{Proj}}_ S(\mathcal{A})$ there is a canonical isomorphism $\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_ T = h^*\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}$ where $\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_ T$ is defined by (

  2. The isomorphisms of (1) are compatible with pullbacks.

  3. There is a canonical map

    \[ \pi ^*\mathcal{M}_0 \longrightarrow \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}. \]
  4. The construction $\mathcal{M} \mapsto \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}$ is functorial in $\mathcal{M}$.

  5. The construction $\mathcal{M} \mapsto \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}$ is exact.

  6. There are canonical maps

    \[ \widetilde{\mathcal{M}} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_{\underline{\text{Proj}}_ S(\mathcal{A})}} \widetilde{\mathcal{N}} \longrightarrow \widetilde{\mathcal{M} \otimes _\mathcal {A} \mathcal{N}} \]

    as in Lemma 27.9.1.

  7. There exist canonical maps

    \[ \pi ^*\mathcal{M} \longrightarrow \bigoplus \nolimits _{n \in \mathbf{Z}} \widetilde{\mathcal{M}(n)} \]

    generalizing (

  8. The formation of $\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}$ commutes with base change.

Proof. Omitted. We should split this lemma into parts and prove the parts separately. $\square$

Comments (2)

Comment #7509 by Matthieu Romagny on

Missing word in 5th sentence of this section: We first describe the value of this sheaf on schemes T mapping into the relative Proj.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 01O5. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.