History of tag 01UP
Go back to the tag's page.
type |
time |
link |
changed the statement
|
2014-07-09 |
1c716d9 |
Typos pointed out by Anfang Zhou
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/05NE#comment-779
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/05NH#comment-780
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00HL#comment-782
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01ED#comment-783
http://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01UP#comment-789
|
changed the statement
|
2013-12-22 |
e179438 |
LaTeX
Introduced a macro
\def\Ker{\text{Ker}}
and replace all occurrences of \text{Ker} with \Ker
|
changed the statement
|
2013-03-17 |
5bf0999 |
More generalities about \Omega_{X/S}
|
moved the statement to file modules.tex
|
2013-03-17 |
8d2ae8b |
Clean up treatment module of differentials
Move the construction of \Omega to the setting of ringed spaces.
Redefine the module of differentials using the universal property. The
agreement with the conormal sheaf of the diagonal is now a lemma. Tried
to find all places where this was used...
|
changed the statement
|
2013-03-17 |
8d2ae8b |
Clean up treatment module of differentials
Move the construction of \Omega to the setting of ringed spaces.
Redefine the module of differentials using the universal property. The
agreement with the conormal sheaf of the diagonal is now a lemma. Tried
to find all places where this was used...
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2011-03-29 |
ee75333 |
Bunch of changes
(1) Starting to write about thickenings of algebraic spaces
(2) Change Omega^1_{X/S} to Omega_{X/S}
(3) Introduced universal homeomorphisms for algebraic spaces
(4) If X ---> Y is a surjective, integral morphism of schemes
and X is an affine scheme, then Y is an affine scheme
(4) Topological invariance of the site X_{spaces, etale} of an
algebraic space X (proof unfinished}
In order to see that also X_{etale} is a topological invariant
we (I think) need to prove the following result: If X --> Y is a
integral, universally injective, surjective morphism of
algebraic spaces then X is a scheme if and only if Y is a
scheme. There are two proofs of this result in the literature
(one by David Rydh and one by Brian Conrad); both reduce the
result to the Noetherian case by limit arguments. I would
prefer a more direct argument...
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2010-03-01 |
ac062ff |
More Morphisms Spaces: Module of differentials
Started to write about module of differentials of a morphism of
algebraic spaces. We want to use it in the discussion of
formally smooth morphisms.
This required some preliminary work improving the exposition in
a few other plaves.
|
assigned tag 01UP
|
2009-05-16 |
fad2e12
|
Started tags infrastructure
new file: scripts/add_tags.py
modified: scripts/functions.py
new file: tags/initial_tags
new file: tags/tags
|
created statement with label lemma-double-structure-gives-derivation in morphisms.tex
|
2009-03-17 |
3662a65 |
Finished with differentials for now and rudimentary version of section
on smooth morphisms
modified: morphisms.tex
|