The Stacks project

Definition 34.3.5. A big Zariski site is any site $\mathit{Sch}_{Zar}$ as in Sites, Definition 7.6.2 constructed as follows:

  1. Choose any set of schemes $S_0$, and any set of Zariski coverings $\text{Cov}_0$ among these schemes.

  2. As underlying category of $\mathit{Sch}_{Zar}$ take any category $\mathit{Sch}_\alpha $ constructed as in Sets, Lemma 3.9.2 starting with the set $S_0$.

  3. As coverings of $\mathit{Sch}_{Zar}$ choose any set of coverings as in Sets, Lemma 3.11.1 starting with the category $\mathit{Sch}_\alpha $ and the class of Zariski coverings, and the set $\text{Cov}_0$ chosen above.

Comments (3)

Comment #79 by Keenan Kidwell on

Probably I'm misunderstanding something, but it seems to me that one could choose the empty set of coverings in the first \item and end up with the same topos (by the result in the Sites chapter showing that the topos is independent of the way we shrink a proper class of coverings satisfying the axioms of a site to a set of coverings). Is this true, or is there something that prohibits it? I admit I haven't read the relevant proof in the Set Theory chapter where a set of coverings is constructed from a proper class of coverings and an initial set , but no matter what is, the set constructed still satisfies the property that every covering in the proper class is combinatorially equivalent to one in the set, and this seems to be the property that matters for the resulting topos.

Comment #86 by on

Yes, that is completely correct. The reason for stating it the way it is done here is that the reader may have (for example) an a priori given collection of cocycle calculations which uses a particular set of coverings and they may want to make sure that those particular coverings are part of the site constructed here.

Comment #87 by Keenan Kidwell on

Got it. Thanks for explaining.

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 34.3: The Zariski topology

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 020S. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.



View Definition 34.3.5 as pdf